Skip to main content
Log in

Resistance to Extinction Functions in Rats Exposed to Alternating Acquisition and Extinction Sessions

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Albino rats were repeatedly conditioned and extinguished on a bar-pressing response in three experiments that employed number of reinforcements, and either pattern of reinforcement or schedule of reinforcement as the independent variables. The extinction functions obtained were interpreted as evidence that (a) number of reinforcements is not an unequivocal determinant of extinction responding, and (b) further investigation of the relative contributions of both the reinforcement and non-reinforcement histories of the organism to subsequent extinction responding is needed, if the extinction functions obtained from alternating aquisition-extinction paradigms are to be accurately predicted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BULLOCK, D. H., & SMITH, W. C. 1953. An effect of repeated conditioning-extinction upon operant strength. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 349–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BUSH, R. R., & MOSTELLER, F. 1951. A mathematical model for simple learning. Psychological Review, 58, 313–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CLARK, R. C., & TAYLOR, B. W. 1960. Effects of repeated extinction of an operant on characteristics of extinction curves. Psychological Reports, 6, 226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DENNY, M. R. 1959. One bar-press per day: Acquisition and extinction. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2, 81–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • GUTHRIE, E. R. 1952. The psychology of learning. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARRIS, P., & NYGAARD, J. E. 1961. Resistance to extinction and number of reinforcements. Psychological Reports, 8, 233–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAYS, W. L. 1963. Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEARST, E. 1961. Resistance to extinction functions in the single organism. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 133–144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HILL, W. F., & SPEAR, N. E. 1963. Extinction in a runway as a function of acquisition level and reinforcement percentage. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 495–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HULL, C. L. 1943. Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • HULL, C. L. 1952. A behavior system. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISON, J. R. 1962. Experimental extinction as a function of number of reinforcements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 314–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISON, J. R., & BIRCH, D. 1961. T maze reversal following differential endbox placement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 200–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JENKINS, W. O., & STANLEY, J. C, Jr. 1950. Partial reinforcement: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 47, 193–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LAUER, D. W., & ESTES, W. K. 1955. Successive acquisitions and extinctions of a jumping habit in relation to schedule of reinforcement. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 48, 8–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MOWRER, O. H., & JONES, H. M. 1945. Habit strength as a function of the pattern of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NORTH, A. M., & STIMMEL, D. T. 1960. Extinction of an instrumental response following a large number of reinforcements. Psychological Reports, 6, 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PERIN, C. T. 1942. Behavior potentiality as a joint function of the amount of taining and degree of hunger at the time of extinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PERKINS, C. C, Jr., & CACIOPPO, A. J. 1950. The effect of intermittent reinforcement on the change in extinction rates following successive re-conditionings. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 794–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SCHAEFFER, R. W. 1963. N-Reinforcements and extinction responding. Psychological Record, 13, 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHAEFFER, R. W., SALZBERG, C. L. BIRKLE, R. A., & RYAN, F. J. 1967. Resistance to extinction as a function of reinforcement patterns. Psychological Record, 17, 353–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. 1938. Behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. 1950. Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 57, 193–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. 1956. A case history in scientific method. American Psychologist, 11, 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WICKENS, P. D., & MILES, R. C. 1954. Extinction changes during a series of reinforcement-extinction sessions. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47, 315–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WILCOXON, F. & WILCOX, R. A. 1964. Some rapid approximate statistical procedures. Pearl River, New York: Lederle Laboratories.

    Google Scholar 

  • WILLIAMS, S. B. 1938. Resistance to extinction as a function of number of reinforcements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 506–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WINER, B. J. 1962. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • YOUTZ, R. E. P. 1938. Reinforcement, extinction, and spontaneous recovery in a non-Pavlovian reaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 305–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by Public Health Service Research Grants MH-08775, MH-08795, and MH-12025, Robert W. Schaeffer, principal investigator. Our indebtedness to R. E. Lushene, T. A. Smith, and R. B. Shumake for their assistance in carrying out the statistical analyses reported in this paper is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schaeffer, R.W., Burks, C.D., Ternes, J.W. et al. Resistance to Extinction Functions in Rats Exposed to Alternating Acquisition and Extinction Sessions. Psychol Rec 19, 225–245 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393846

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393846

Navigation