Skip to main content
Log in

The Grading of Defect: Vicissitudes of a Classification

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Progress towards the grading of mental defectives into idiot, imbecile, moron (or feeble-minded) is here traced in a selection of authors: Esquirol, Mayo, Howe, Griesinger, and D. Galton. The starting point is Pinels failure to distinguish amentia and dementia, the close Galton’s recognition of a feeble-minded class on the basis of sensory test indications. The influence on the development of grading of the following is indicated: somatic theories of mental abnormality, concern over the provision of institutional care, interest in moral inadequacy, and the prevalence of terminology which is emotive rather than factual. Present terminology is queried on this basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BARR, M. W. 1904. Mental defectives: their history, treatment and training. Philadelphia: Blakiston.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARDNO, J. A. 1968. Idiocy, imbecility: an early American contrast. Psychol. Rec., 18, 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • DICKENS, C. 1900. American notes. London, etc.: Nelson. (Originally published 1842).

    Google Scholar 

  • ESQUIROL, J. E. D. 1965. Mental maladies: a treatise on insanity. New York: Harper. (Reprint of English translation by E. K. Hunt, Philadelphia, 1845. originally published 1838.)

    Google Scholar 

  • GALTON, D. 1894. Feeble-minded children. The Nineteenth Century, 35, 276–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRIESINGER, W. 1867. Mental pathology and therapeutics. (2nd ed.) (Translated C. L. Robertson & J. Rutherford.) London: The New Sydenham Society. (2nd ed. originally published 1861.)

    Google Scholar 

  • HINSIE, L. E., & CAMPBELL, R. J. 1960. Psychiatric dictionary. (3rd ed.) New York: Oxford Univer. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOWE, S. G., et al. 1858. On the causes of idiocy. Edinburgh: MacLachlan & Stewart. ( Originally published, 1848.)

    Google Scholar 

  • LEE, S., Ed. 1961. The dictionary of national biography. The concise dictionary. London: Oxford Univer. Press. (Originally published, 1903.) (Cited as CDNB.)

    Google Scholar 

  • MAYO, T. 1838. Elements of the pathology of the human mind. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • PINEL, P. 1962. A treatise on insanity. New York: Hafner. (Originally published, 1801. (translated D. D. Davis, 1806; 1962 ed. a facsimile of 1806, with introduction P. F. Cranefield, published under the auspices of the Library of the New York Academy of Medicine.)

    Google Scholar 

  • SEGUIN, E. 1907. Idiocy: and its treatment by the physiological method. New York: Teachers’ College, Columbia Univer. (Originally published, 1866.)

    Google Scholar 

  • ZILBOORG, G., & HENRY, G. W. 1941. A history of medical psychology. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research reported in this article was made possible by a grant from the Australian Research Grants Committee, No. 65/15261, for which grateful acknowledgement is made.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cardno, J.A. The Grading of Defect: Vicissitudes of a Classification. Psychol Rec 18, 597–606 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393811

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393811

Navigation