Skip to main content
Log in

Colony Noise Levels in Monkeys as a Function of Various Stimulus Conditions

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An attempt was made to use noise levels in the presence of different stimulus conditions as a measure of the group response by an established colony of pigtailed monkeys. Results suggest that intensity of vocalization differs significantly as a function of different stimulus conditions and may hold considerable potential for research on group processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BUTLER, R. A. 1957. Discrimination learning by rhesus monkeys to auditory incentives. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 50, 239–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BUTLER, R. A. 1958. The differential effect of visual and auditory incentives on the performance of monkeys. Amer. J. Psychol., 71, 591–593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MASON, W. A. 1965. Determinants of social behavior in young chimpanzees. In A. M. Schrier, H. F. Harlow, & F. Stollnitz (Eds.), Behavior of non-human primates. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 335–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROWELL, T. E. 1962. Agonistic noises of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Sympos. zool. Soc. Lond., 8, 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was conducted while the senior author was on a National Science Foundation Summer Fellowship for Graduate Teaching Assistants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gallup, G.G., Prim, M.M. Colony Noise Levels in Monkeys as a Function of Various Stimulus Conditions. Psychol Rec 18, 89–91 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393747

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393747

Navigation