Skip to main content
Log in

Instrumental Performance as a Function of Increasing and Decreasing Delays of Reinforcement

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rats (N=56) were trained in a runway under increasing (I), decreasing (D), and random (R) conditions of delay. Each group was then split with one-third of Ss being extinguished under I, D, and R conditions of delay-box confinement. Both delay patterns in training and confinement patterns in extinction affected resistance to extinction. The results were considered in terms of: (a) cognitive-dissonance theory; (b) the work of Marx, et al. on ordered variations in incentives; and (c) previous work which has demonstrated the importance of delay-box confinement in extinction and the direction of shifts in delay from training to extinction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANDERSON, N. H. 1963. Comparison of different populations: Resistance to extinction and transfer. Psychol. Rev., 70, 162–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DEWS, P. 1960. Free-operant behavior under conditions of delayed reinforcement: I. CRF-type schedules. J. exp. anal. Beh., 3, 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EDWARDS, A. L. 1960. Experimental design in psychological research. New York: Rinehart (Rev. ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • FERSTER, C. B. 1953. Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement. J. exp. Psychol., 45, 218–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LAWRENCE, D. H., & FESTINGER, L. 1962. Deterrents and reinforcement: The psychology of insufficient reward. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARX, M. H., & EDWARDS, D. C. 1966. Speed of nonreinforced running response following increasing and decreasing orders of sucrose concentrations. J. exp. Psychol., 71, 160–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SCHOONOVER, J., & LAWRENCE, D. H. 1962. Resistance to extinction as a function of the number of delay trials. Psychol. Rep., 11, 275–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TOMBAUGH, T. N. 1966. Resistance to extinction as a function of the interaction between training and extinction delays. Psychol. Rep., 19, 791–798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • TOMBAUGH, T. N., & MARX, M. H. 1965. Effects of ordered and constant sucrose concentrations on nonreinforced performance. J. exp. Psychol., 69, 630–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WIKE, E. L., & McWILLIAMS, J. 1967. Duration of delay, delay-box confinement, and runway performance. Psychol Rep.

  • WIKE, E. L., MELLGREN, R. L., & WIKE, S. S. 1968. Runway performance as a function of delayed reinforcement and delay-box confinement. Psych. Rec. 18

  • WIKE, E. L., PLATT, J. R., PARKER, L. 1965. Patterns of delayed reinforcement and resistance to extinction. Psychonom. Sci., 3, 13–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by a grant GB 4299 from the National Science Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wike, E.L., Sheldon, S.S. & Cour, C.A. Instrumental Performance as a Function of Increasing and Decreasing Delays of Reinforcement. Psychol Rec 18, 19–24 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393735

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393735

Navigation