Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to investigate what happens to the phenomenal size of an object stored in memory. Fifteen adult female Ss were divided into three groups of five Ss each. Each group estimated the size of a set of circles 30 and 60 sec. after presentation. The groups differed according to the amount of memory inspection they were permitted during the delay period. Results indicated that there is no overall difference between the time limits investigated, except when there is a specific instruction to call up and inspect the object from memory. The implications of these findings for both traditional Gestalt theory and a general theory of memory were discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ALLPORT, G. 1930. Change and decay in the visual memory image. Brit. J. Psychol., 21, 138–178.
GARDNER, R. W., & LONG, R. I. 1960. Errors of the standard and illusion effects with L-shaped figures. Percept. mot. skills. 10, 107–109.
GIBSON, J. J. 1929. The reproduction of visually perceived forms. J. exp. Psychol., 12, 1–39.
KOFFKA, K. 1935. Principles of Gestalt psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
LANDIS, D., JONES, J. M., & REITER, J. 1966. Two experiments on perceived size of coins. Percept. mot. skill., 23, 719–729.
PIAGET, J. 1961. Les mécanismes perceptifs. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
PIAGET, J., & MORF, A. 1956. Note sur la comparison de lingnes perpendiculaires éagles. Arch. de Psychol., 33, 233–255.
PIAGET, J., VINH-BANG, & MATALON, B. 1958. Note on the law of the temporal maximum of some optico-geometric illusions. Amer. J. Psychol. 71, 277–282.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Landis, D., Harrison, S. Effect of Amount of Scanning from Memory on Phenomenal Size of Objects. Psychol Rec 17, 77–80 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393692
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393692