Abstract
Two series of experiments were designed to investigate the delay in RT as a function of S’s expectancy of future responses. The first series (Time Relation) investigated the effect of lengthening the time interval between pairs of choice RTs and comparing S’s response to the first signal with his response to a single signal. Interval was not significant and, in addition, this series of experiments failed to replicate the results of earlier investigators who found a significant delay. The second series (Complexity) investigated the effect of making S’s multiple responses increasingly complex and comparing his first response of this multiple set to his response to a single signal. Complexity level was not a significant variable. However, there now was a significant difference between a single response and the first response of a multiple set. The results of the two series were interpreted as being due to a difference in S’s expectancy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
DAVIS, R. 1956. The limits of the “psychological refractory period.” Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 8, 24–38.
GOTTSDANKER, R., BROADBENT, L., & Van Sant, C. 1963. Reaction time to single and first signals. J. exp. Psychol., 66, 163–167.
POULTON, E. 1950. Perceptual anticipation and reaction time. Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 2, 99–112.
TELFORD, C. 1931. The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. J. exp. Psychol., 14, 1–35.
VINCE, M. 1948. The intermittency of control movements and the psychological refractory period. Brit. J. Psychol., 38, 149–157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by Grant MH 08738 from the National Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bartz, A.E. Reaction Time and Complexity of Subsequent Responses. Psychol Rec 16, 313–321 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393674
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393674