Skip to main content
Log in

Learning A Complex Ritualized Social Role

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four basic experiments and 12 variations were conducted in an investigation of the learning of a complex social role. The results were as predicted from Gestalt theory. Learning was more efficient when one had a model to observe than when one had to learn by trial-and-error and reinforcement. Parts of the role that were relatively arbitrary and senseless were the most difficult to learn. Results indicate that learning in certain situations is facilitated by a model or an illustration that allows the subject a survey of the structure of the role. Results were discussed by means of experimental variations which posed problems for research. Implications were drawn for learning, for programmed instruction, and for social psychology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ALLPORT, F. H. 1924. Social psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • BANDURA, A. & WALTERS, R. H. 1963. Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOVLAND, C. I. 1952. A “communication analysis” of concept learning. Psychol. Rev., 59, 461–472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KOFFKA, K. 1959. The growth of the mind. Paterson, N.J.: Littlefield, Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • KOHLER, W. 1959. Mentality of apes. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, E. J. 1962. The learning process and programmed instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • LUCHINS, A. S. & LUCHINS, E. H. 1959. Rigidity of behavior. Eugene: Univ. of Oregon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LUCHINS, A. S. & LUCHINS, E. H. 1961. Imitation by rote and by understanding. J. soc. Psychol., 54, 175–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • LUCHINS, A. S. & LUCHINS, E. H. 1963 The role of understanding in social influences on judgment. J soc. Psychol., 61, 133–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MEIERHENRY, W. C. (Ed.) 1961. Learning theory and A. V. utilization. A. V. Communications Rev., Supplement 4.

  • MILLER, N. E. & DOLLARD, J. 1941. Social learning and imitation. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOWRER, O. H. 1960. Learning theory and the symbolic process. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NEIMAN, L. J. & HUGHES, J. W. 1951. The problem of the concept of role: a resurvey of the literature. Soc. Forces, 30, 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. 1958. Teaching machines. Science, 128, 969–977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • TARDE, G. 1903. The laws of imitation. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • TOLMAN, E. C. 1949. There is more than one kind of learning. Psychol. Rev., 56, 144–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WERTHEIMER, M. 1945. Productive thinking. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luchins, A.S., Luchins, E.H. Learning A Complex Ritualized Social Role. Psychol Rec 16, 177–187 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393657

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393657

Navigation