Skip to main content

Perspectives in Psychology: XXIV Control of Coverants, the Operants of the Mind

Abstract

Some of the consequences of assuming that private events obey the same laws as public ones are explored. Corollaries to this assumption are that knowledge of the topography of a response is not required to control its frequency, and that Premack’s differential probability hypothesis can be exploited to control reinforcement contingencies. Preliminary indications are that behavioristic analyses of private events are fruitful and will yield powerful tools in the control of other behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. FERSTER, C. B., NURNBERGER, J. I. & LEVITT, E. B. The control of eating. J. Mathetics, 1962, I, 87–109.

    Google Scholar 

  2. GOLDIAMOND, I. Stuttering and fluency as manipulatable operant response classes. L. KRASNER and L. P. ULLMANN (Eds.), In Research in behavior modification, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965. Pp. 106–156.

    Google Scholar 

  3. HAMMOND, E. C. The effects of smoking. Scientific Amer., 1962, 207, 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. HOLLAND, J. G., & SKINNER, B. F. The analysis of behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  5. HOMME, L. E. Control of the relaxation operant. Unpublished manuscript, May 1965.

  6. KANTOR, J. R. Principles of psychology. Vol. 1. Bloomington: Principia Press, 1924.

  7. KANTOR, J. R. Principles of psychology. Vol. 2. Bloomington: Principia Press, 1926.

  8. PREMACK, D. Toward empirical behavior laws: I. positive reinforcement. Psychol. Rev., 1959, 66, 219–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. PREMACK, D. Reinforcement theory. Paper read at the Nebraska Motivation Sympos., Lincoln, 1965.

  10. SKINNER, B. F. The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  11. SKINNER, B. F. Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1953. P. 237.

    Google Scholar 

  12. SKINNER, B. F. Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. SLACK, C. W. Social science is no damn good. (Proposed title) Princeton: Van Nostrand, in press.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lloyd E. Homme.

Additional information

Thanks are due to all of the author’s Westinghouse colleagues, especially D. T. Tosti, C. B. Chadwick, J. A. Colosimo, P. C.deBaca, and K. M. Kamerman, for their more or less successful attempts at withholding aversive stimulation during the development of the notions which appear in this paper, and for occasionally generating old shopworn ideas which could be refurbished into the sparkling new ones found here.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Homme, L.E. Perspectives in Psychology: XXIV Control of Coverants, the Operants of the Mind. Psychol Rec 15, 501–511 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393622

Download citation