Abstract
Escape and avoidance behavior of two rats under a temporally defined schedule of negative reinforcement was compared for the cases of “non-cumulating Time Out” and “cumulating Time Out.” In the former case, a response in TO (Time Out) has no effect on the duration of TO; in the latter, a response in TO extends TO, and the duration of TO is measured from the last response in it. The findings suggest that the cumulating TO contingency does not, given the parametric conditions of this experiment, add to the efficiency of “avoidance” responding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
KELLER, F. S. Light aversion in the white rat. Psychol. Rec., 1941, 4, 235–250.
SIDLEY, N. A. Two parameters of a temporally defined schedule of negative reinforcement. J. exp. Anal. Behav., in press.
SIDMAN, M. An adjusting avoidance schedule. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1962, 5, 247–277.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant G18633.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sidley, N.A., Malott, R.W. & Schoenfeld, W.N. A comparison of cumulating and non-cumulating time out for escape and avoidance behavior under a temporally defined schedule of negative reinforcement. Psychol Rec 13, 175–179 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393516
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393516