Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of stimulus generalization of tendencies to respond and not to respond

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • DVORINE, I. Dvorine color perception testing charts. Baltimore Maryland: Waverly Press, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUTTMAN, N. and KALISH, H. I. Discriminability and stimulus generalization. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 79–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HONIG, W. K. Generalization of extinction on the spectral continuum. Psychol. Rec., 1961, 11, 269–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • HONIG, W. K. Gradients of acquisition and extinction obtained after equivalent training conditions. Paper read at E.P.A, Philadelphia, April 1961.

  • KALISH, H. I. The relationship between discriminability and generalization: a re-evaluation. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 55, 637–644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • THOMAS, D. R. Stimulus generalization viewed as a problem in perception. Paper read at A.P.A., New York, Sept. 1961.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported in part by U.S.P.H.S. grant M-4203.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomas, D.R., Lanier, W.G. A comparison of stimulus generalization of tendencies to respond and not to respond. Psychol Rec 12, 61–65 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393441

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393441

Navigation