Skip to main content
Log in

A preface to the mind-body problem

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

As a preface to the mind-body problem, this paper proposed three assumptions basic to the issue. The assumptions referred to the number of basic events, the method of organization, and the nature of the basic events or substances. An approach to the mind-body problem was proposed in terms of a position on each of the three assumptions. This approach was applied to clinical practice on the strong presumption that mind-body approaches have striking implications for the operations of the clinician. Accordingly, implications were drawn from this approach and applied to the criteria and meaning of psychological and nonpsychological clinical events, the processes and occurrences of the human body from a strictly psychological viewpoint, the nature of psychological explanation of clinical events, the hierarchy of sciences, the relationships between psychological and nonpsychological concepts including the presumption of intermediating factors, and the nature of diagnostic rationale and procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BROWN, J. F. Psychology and the social order; an introduction to the dynamic study of social fields. New York, London: McGraw Hill, 1936.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • BURT, C. The subnormal mind. (3rd ed.) London: Oxford Univer. Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • CANTOR, G. N. & CROMWELL, R. L. The principle of reductionism and mental deficiency. Amer. J. ment. Defic., 1957, 61, 461–466.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FEIGL, H. The mind-body problem in the development of logical empiricism. In H. Feigl and May Brodbeck (Eds.) Readings in the philosophy of science. New York: Appleton-Ceutury-Crofts, 1953, Pp. 612–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEIGL, H. Aims of education for our age of science: reflections) of a logical empiricist. In N. B. Henry (Ed.), Modern philosophies and education. Chicago: Univer. Chicago Press, 1955, Pp. 304–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEIGL, H. The “mental” and the “physical.” In H. Feigl, M. Scriven, G. Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Vol. 2. Concepts, theories, and the mind-body problem. Minneapolis: Univer. of Minnesota Press, 1958, Pp. 370–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • JESSOR, R. The problem of reductionism in psychology. Psychol. Rev., 1958, 65, 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JESSOR, R. Issues in the phenomenological approach to personality. J. Indiv. Psychol., 1961, 17, 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. Preface to interbehavioral psychology. Psychol. Rec., 1942, 5, 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. The logic of modern science. Bloomington, Ind.: Principia Press, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. Events and constructs in the science of psychology. Philosophy: banished and recalled. Psychol. Rec., 1957, 7, 55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KRECH, D. Dynamic systems, psychological fields, and hypothetical constructs. Psychol. Rev., 1950, 57, 283–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LITTMAN, R. A. & ROSEN, E. The molar-molecular distinction. In M. H. Marx (Ed.), Psychological theory. New York: Macmillen, 1951, Pp. 144–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGEOCH, J. A. Formal criteria of systematic psychology. Psychol. Rev., 1933, 40, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAHRER A. R., THORP, T., & STERNLICHT, I. The role of cues in psychodi-agnosis J. gen. Psychol., 1960, 62, 247–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MAHRER, A. R., YOUNG, H. H-, & KATZ, G. Toward a psychological rationale for understanding the effects of anti-depressant medication. In C. L. Lindley (Ed.), Cooperative chemotherapy studies in psychiatry and research approaches to mental illness. Washington D. C.: Veterans Administration, 1960, Pp. 131–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAHRER, A. R. & YOUNG, H. H. The combination of psychodiagnostic cues. J. Pers., in press. (a)

  • MAHRER, A. R. & YOUNG, H. H. The onset of stuttering. J. gen. Psychol., in press, (b)

  • MARX, M. H. The general nature of theory construction. In M. H. Marx (Ed.), Psychological theory. New York: Macmillan, 1951, Pp. 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • MONEY, J. Mind-body dualism and the unity of bodymind. Behav. Sci., 1956, 1, 212–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PRATT, C. C. The logic of modern psychology. New York: Macmillan, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROTTER, J. B. Social learning and clinical psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1954.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • SCHWAB, J. J. What do scientists do? Behav. Sci., 1960, 5, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WOODGER, J. H. Biology and language. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge Univer. Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is indebted to Drs. Richard Jessor, Michael Wertheimer, and Harl H. Young for their cogent suggestions and critical evaluation of this paper. An extended version of this paper was presented at the Fifth Inter-American Congress of Psychology, Mexico City, D. F., December, 1957.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahrer, A.R. A preface to the mind-body problem. Psychol Rec 12, 53–60 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393440

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393440

Navigation