Summary
In an experiment reported by Ogilvie it was found that binocular CFF was significantly increased when measurements were taken while S was listening to a random noise “fluttering” in-phase with flickering light. A replication using monocular vision and an artificial pupil under the four conditions of Ogilvie’s experiment—no noise, steady noise, in-phase noise and out-of-phase noise—yielded negative results. A second study was carried out involving a comparison of the effect of noise on CFF with monocular vision but with and without the artificial pupil. A partial replication of Ogilvie’s results were obtained without the artificial pupil. These results seem to require caution in theorizing about possible neural mechanisms for the sensory interaction thus demonstrated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
OGILVIE, J. C. Effect of auditory flutter on the visual critical flicker frequency. Canad. J. Psychol., 1956, 10, 61–68. (a)
OGILVIE, J. C. The interaction of auditory flutter and CFF: The effect of brightness. Canad. J. Psychol., 1956, 10, 207–210. (b)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by Project MICHIGAN under Department of the Army Contract (DA-36-039-SC-78801) administered by the U. S. Army Signal Corps. Publication costs were supported from a grant to the senior author from the Ford Foundation.
The authors were assisted in the data collection phase by Jay Caldwell during Exp. I and by Marius C. Smith during Exp. II.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walker, E.L., Sawyer, T.M. The interaction between critical flicker frequency and acoustic stimulation. Psychol Rec 11, 187–191 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393403
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393403