This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
BORING, E. G. Size constancy and Emmert’s law. Amer. J. Psychol.,. 1940, 53, 293–95.
CROOKES, T. G. The apparent size of after-images. Amer. J Psychol., 1959, 72, 547–53.
EDWARDS, W. Apparent size of after-images under conditions of reduction. Amer. J. Psychol., 1953, 66, 449–55.
EDWARDS, W. & BORING, E. G. What is Emmert’s law? Amer. J. Psychol., 1951, 64, 416–22.
HASTORF, A. H & KENNEDY, J. L. Emmert’s law and size constancy. Amer. J. Psychol., 1957, 70, 114–16.
YOUNG, F. A. Boring’s interpretation of Emmert’s law. Amer. J. Psychol., 1950, 63, 277–80.
YOUNG, F. A. Concerning Emmert’s law. Amer. J. Psychol., 1951, 64, 124–28.
YOUNG, F. A. The projection of after-images and Emmert’s law. J. Gen. Psychol., 1948, 39, 161–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The following is a thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts with Distinction in Psychology.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Price, G.R. An Emmert’s law of apparent sizes. Psychol Rec 11, 145–151 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393397
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393397