Skip to main content
Log in

What next in the psychology of musical measurement?

  • Articles
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. BEINSTOCK, S. F. A review of recent studies in musical aptitude. J. educ. Psychol., 1942, 33, 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. DRAKE, R. M. Examiner manual for Drake Musical Aptitude Tests. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  3. FARNSWORTH, P. R. An historical, critical and experimental study of the Seashore-Kwal-wasser test battery. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1931, 9:5, 291–392.

    Google Scholar 

  4. FARNSWORTH, P. R. Musical taste: its measurement and cultural nature. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  5. HOLMES, J. A. Increased reliabilities and new keys and norms for the Kwalwasser-Dykema Music Tests. J. genet. Psychol., 1954, 85, 65–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. KWALWASSER, J., & DYKEMA, P. J. Manual of directions for the Kwalwasser-Dykema Music Tests. New York: Fischer, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  7. KWALWASSER, J. Exploring the musical mind. New York: Coleman Ross, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  8. LUNDIN, R. W. The development and validation of a set of musical ability tests. Unpublished doctor’s dissertation, Indiana University, 1947.

  9. LUNDIN, R. W. An objective psychology of music. New York: Ronald, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McLEISH, J. The validation of Seashore’s measures of musical talent by factoral methods. Brit. J. Psychol., Stat. Sec., 1950, 3, 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. MUELLER, J. H., et al. Studies in appreciation of art. Univ. Oregon Publ., 1934, 4, 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  12. MUELLER, J. H., & HEVNER, K. Trends in musical taste. Indiana Univ. Publ. Humanity Ser., 1942, No. 8.

  13. MUELLER, J. H. The American symphony orchestra: a social history of musical tastes. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  14. NEU, D. M. A critical review of the literature on “absolute pitch.” Psychol. Bull., 1947, 44, 249–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. OAKES, W. F. An experimental study of pitch naming and pitch discrimination reactions. J. genet. Psychol., 1955, 86, 237–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. SEASHORE, C. E. Manual of instructions and interpretations for measures of musical talent. New York: Columbia Gramophone, 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  17. SEASHORE, C. E., LEWIS, D., & SAETVEIT, J. G. Seashore measures of musical talents. (Rev. ed.) Camden, New Jersey: R. C. A/Manufacturing Co., 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  18. SEASHORE, C. E., LEWIS, D., & SAETVEIT, J. G. Seashore measures of musical talents manual. (Rev. ed.) New York: Psychological Corp., 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  19. STANTON, H. M. Measurement of musical talent: the Eastman experiment. Univ. Iowa Stud. Psychol. Music, 1935, 2, 1–140.

    Google Scholar 

  20. WILSON, W. E. Use of the Seashore measures of musical talents in the prediction of certain academic grades for music students at Pennsylvania State College. Unpublished master’s dissertation, Pennsylvania State College, 1950.

  21. WYATT, R. F. The improvability of pitch discrimination. Psychol. Monogr., 1945, 58, Whole No. 267, 1–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lundin, R.W. What next in the psychology of musical measurement?. Psychol Rec 8, 1–6 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393299

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393299

Navigation