The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 133–151 | Cite as

Individual behavior, culture, and social change

  • Sigrid S. GlennEmail author


The principle of operant selection is examined as a prototype of cultural selection, and the role of the social environment is suggested as the critical element in the emergence of cultural phenomena. Operant contingencies are compared to cultural selection contingencies, designated as metacontingencies. Both of these types of contingency relations result in evolving lineages of recurrences that can become increasingly complex in the number and organization of their elements. In addition to its role in the recurring interlocking behavioral contingencies that constitute cultural organization, operant behavior plays another role in cultures. Although the operants of individuals are functionally independent of one another, the behavior of each person may contribute to a cumulative effect that is relevant to the well-being of many people. Similarly, the outcomes of metacontingencies may also contribute to a cumulative effect. The relation between independently evolving operant lineages, or between independently evolving cultural lineages, and their cumulative effect is identified as a macrocontingency. Macrocontingencies do not involve cultural-level selection per se. Effective cultural engineering requires identifying the macrocontingencies that produce less than desirable effects and altering the relevant operant contingencies or metacontingencies to produce change in the cumulative effects.

Key words

operant contingencies macrocontingencies metacontingencies cultural selection operant selection 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Biglan, A. (1995). Changing cultural practices: A contextualist framework for intervention research. Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bonner, J. T. (1980). The evolution of culture in animals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Box, H. O. (1984). Primate behavior and social ecology. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, germs, and steel. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Friman, P. C. (2004). Up with this I shall not put: 10 reasons why I disagree with Branch and Vollmer on behavior used as a count noun. The Behavior Analyst, 27, 99–106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Galef, B. G., Jr. (1988). Imitation in animals: History, definition, and interpretation of data from the psychological laboratory. In T. R. Zentall & B. G. Galef, Jr. (Eds.), Social learning: Psychological and biological perspectives (pp. 3–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Glenn, S. S. (1986). Metacontingencies in Walden Two. Behavior Analysis and Social Action, 5, 2–8.Google Scholar
  8. Glenn, S. S. (1988). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 161–179.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Glenn, S. S. (2003). Operant contingencies and the origin of cultures. In K. A. Lattal & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 223–242). New York: Klewer Academic/ Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glenn, S. S., & Malott, M. E. (in press). Complexity and evolution. Behavior and Social Issues.Google Scholar
  11. Goldstein, M. K., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1998). From candidate to criminal: The contingencies of corruption in elected public office. Behavior and Social Issues, 8, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris, M. (1989). Our kind. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  14. Hull, D. L., Langman, R. E., & Glenn, S. S. (2001). A general account of selection: Biology, immunology, and behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 511–573.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  16. Kawamura, S. (1959). The process of sub-culture propagation among Japanese macaques. Primates, 2, 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Layng, T V. J., & Andronis, P. T (1984). Toward a functional analysis of delusional speech and hallucinatory behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 139–156.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Malott, M. E. (2003). Paradox of organizational change. Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  19. Malott, M. E., & Salas-Martinez, M. W. (2004). Strategic organizational change in higher education. OBM Newsletter, 18(2), 9–11.Google Scholar
  20. Malott, R. W. (1998). Performance management and welfare reform: The three-contingency model of performance management applied to welfare reform. Behavior and Social Issues, 8, 109–139.Google Scholar
  21. Malott, R. W., & Suarez, E. A. T. (2004). Principles of behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  22. Mattaini, M. (1995). Teaching cultural design: Shaping new behaviorists. Behavior and Social Issues, 5 (2), 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mawhinney, V. T. (1995). Metabehaviors as discriminative stimuli for planned cultural evolution. Behavior and Social Issues, 5(1), 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nevin, J. A. (1998). Contingencies of welfare reform. Behavior and Social Issues, 8, 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Palmer, D. C. (1991). A behavioral interpretation of memory. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 261–279). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ray, R. D., Upson, J. D., & Henderson, B. J. (1977). A systems approach to behavior: III. Organismic pace and complexity in timespace fields. The Psychological Record, 27, 649–682.Google Scholar
  27. Schwartz, B. (1974). On going back to nature: A review of Seligman and Hager’s Biological Boundaries of Learning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 183–198.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Skinner, B. F. (1984a). Author’s response: Some consequences of selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 502–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Skinner, B. F (1984b). The evolution of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 217–221.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Skinner, B. F (1987). Why we are not acting to save the world. In Upon further reflection (pp. 1–14). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Todorov, J. C, Moreira, M. B., & Moreira, M. (2004). Metacontingencies: Interlocked and unrelated contingencies. In Contemporary challenges in the behavioral approach: A Brazilian overview (pp. 221–225). Santo Andre, Brazil: ESETec Editores Associados.Google Scholar
  33. Ulman, J. D. (1998). Toward a more complete science of human behavior: Behaviorology plus institutional economics. Behavior and Social Issues, 8, 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavior AnalysisUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations