The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 125–135 | Cite as

An Analysis of Verbal Stimulus Control in Intraverbal Behavior: Implications for Practice and Applied Research

Conceptual Article

Abstract

A common characteristic of the language deficits experienced by children with autism (and other developmental disorders) is their failure to acquire a complex intraverbal repertoire. The difficulties with learning intraverbal behaviors may, in part, be related to the fact that the stimulus control for such behaviors usually involves highly complex verbal stimuli. The antecedent verbal control of intraverbal behavior may involve discriminative stimuli (i.e., discriminated operants), conditional stimulus control, and/or control by compound stimuli. Distinctions among these different types of antecedent control are presented, along with recommendations for intervention procedures that may facilitate the acquisition of intraverbal behavior.

Key words

intraverbal behavior stimulus control verbal behavior conditional discriminations compound stimuli 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alonso-Á lvarez, B., & Pérez-González, L. A. (2006). Emergence of complex conditional discriminations by joint control of compound samples. The Psychological Record, 56, 447–463.Google Scholar
  2. Augustson, E. M., Dougher, M. J., & Markham, M. R. (2000). Emergence of conditional stimulus relations and transfer of respondent eliciting functions among compound stimuli. The Psychological Record, 50, 745–770.Google Scholar
  3. Axe, J. B. (2008). Conditional discrimination in the intraverbal relation: A review and recommendations for future research. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 24, 159–174.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Axe, J. B., & Sainato, D. M. (2010). Matrix training of preliteracy skills with preschoolers with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 635–652.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Catania, A. C. (2007). Learning. Cornwallon-Hudson, NY: Sloan Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Cohn, S. I., & Weiss, S. J. (2007). Stimulus control and compounding with ambient odor as a discriminative stimulus on a free-operant baseline. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 261–273.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Eikeseth, S., Smith, D. P., & Klintwall, L. (in press). Discrete trial training and discrimination training. In P. Sturmey, J. Tarbox, D. Dixon, & J. L. Matson (Eds.), Handbook of Early Intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorders: Research, Practice, and Policy. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Goldsmith, T. R., LeBlanc, L. A., & Sautter, R. A. (2007). Teaching intraverbal behavior to children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Green, G. (2001). Behavior analytic instruction for children with autism: Advances in stimulus control technology. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grow, L. L., Carr, J. E., Kodak, T. M., Jostad, C. M., & Kisamore, A. N. (2011). A comparison of methods for teaching receptive labeling to children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 475–498.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Gutierrez Jr, A., Hale, M. N., O’Brien, H. A., Fischer, A. J., Durocher, J. S., & Alessandri, M. (2009). Evaluating the effectiveness of two commonly used discrete trial procedures for teaching receptive discrimination to young children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 630–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ingvarsson, E. T., Cammilleri, A. C., & Macias. H. (2012). Emergent listener responses following intraverbal training in children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 654–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ingvarsson, E. T., & Hollobaugh, T. (2010). Acquisition of intraverbal behavior: Teaching children with autism to mand for questions to answers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 1–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Ingvarsson, E. T., & Le, D. D. (2011). Further evaluation of prompting tactics for establishing intraverbal responding in children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 75–93.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingvarsson, E. T., Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Stephenson, K. M. (2007). An evaluation of intraverbal training to generate socially appropriate responses to novel questions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 411–429.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Lovaas, O. I. (2003). Teaching individuals with developmental delays: Basic intervention techniques. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  17. Maurice, C., Green, G., & Luce, S. (1996). Behavioral intervention for young children with autism: A manual for parents and professionals. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  18. Michael, J. (1985). Two kinds of verbal behavior plus a possible third. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 3, 1–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Michael, J., Palmer, D. C., & Sundberg, M. L. (2011). The multiple control of verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 3–22.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Miguel, C. F., Petursdottir, A. I., & Carr, J. E. (2005). The effects of multiple-tact and receptive-discrimination training on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 27–41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Palmer, D. C. (1998). The speaker as listener: The interpretation of structural regularities in verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15, 3–16.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Partington, J. W., & Bailey, J. S. (1993). Teaching intraverbal behavior to preschool children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 11, 9–18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Pérez-González, L. A., & Alonso-á lvarez, B. (2008). Common control by compound samples in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90, 81–101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Pérez-González, L. A., Garcia-Ansenjo, L., Williams, G., & Carnerero, J. J. (2007). Emergence of intraverbal antonyms in children with pervasive developmental disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 697–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Petursdottir, A. I. & Carr, J. E. (2011). A review of recommendations for sequencing receptive and expressive language instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 859–876.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Petursdottir, A. I., Carr, J. E., Lechago, S. A., & Almason, S. M. (2008). An evaluation of intraverbal training and listener training for teaching categorization skills. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 53–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Petursdottir, A. I., & Haflidadottir, R. D. (2009). A comparison of four strategies for teaching a small foreign-language vocabulary. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 685–690.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Shillingsburg, M. A., Kelley, E., Roane, H. S., Kisamore, A., & Brown, M. R. (2009). Evaluation and training of yes-no responding across verbal operants. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 209–223.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127–146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smeets, P. M., Schenk, J. J., & Barnes, D. (1994). Establishing transfer from identity to arbitrary matching tasks via complex stimuli under testing conditions: A followup study. The Psychological Record, 44, 521–536.Google Scholar
  33. Stromer, R., & Mackay, H. A. (1990). Arbitrary stimulus relations and delayed identity matching to complex samples. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 8, 22–25.Google Scholar
  34. Stromer, R., & Stromer, J. B. (1990a). The formation of arbitrary stimulus classes in matching to complex samples. The Psychological Record, 40, 51–66.Google Scholar
  35. Stromer, R., & Stromer, J. B. (1990b). Matching to complex samples: Further study of arbitrary stimulus classes. The Psychological Record, 40, 505–516.Google Scholar
  36. Sundberg, M. L., & Sundberg, C. A. (2011). Intraverbal behavior and verbal conditional discriminations in typically developing children and children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 23–43.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Wolf, M. M. (1963). Some effects of combined SDs. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 343–347.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral ScienceOslo and Akershus University CollegeOsloNorway
  2. 2.UK Young Autism Project and the Department of Behavioral ScienceNorway

Personalised recommendations