Advertisement

The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 125–130 | Cite as

Using a Lag Schedule to Increase Variability of Verbal Responding in an Individual With Autism

  • Carrie Susa
  • Henry D. SchlingerJr.
Article

Abstract

Research has shown that reinforcing novel behaviors can increase the number of different ways that an individual behaves (Goetz & Baer, 1973; Pryor, Haag, & O’Reilly, 1969). However, it was not until more recently that researchers began to consider variability to be a reinforceable operant in and of itself (Neuringer, 2002). More specifically, Neuringer suggested that variability can be taught using a Lag x schedule of reinforcement, in which x refers to the number of previous responses from which the current response must differ in order for reinforcement to occur (Page & Neuringer, 1985). The purpose of the present study was to extend one of the first studies of a Lag x schedule on verbal responses with human subjects (Lee, McComas, & Jawor, 2002), by increasing the lag criteria while attempting to address some of methodological limitations of the study. The participant was a 7-year-old male with autism. A changing criterion design was used and results showed that 3 novel responses were acquired and varied according to the lag schedule of reinforcement.

Key words

autism intraverbal lag schedule of reinforcement variability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abreu-Rodrigues, J., Lattal, K.A., Dos Santos, C.V., & Matos, R. A. (2005). Variation, repetition, and choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 83, 147–168.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Donahoe, J. W., & Parmer, D. C. (1994). Learning and complex behavior. Need-ham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  4. Duker, P.C., & van Lent, C. (1991). Inducing variability in communicative gestures used by severely retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 379–386.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Esch, J. W., Esch, B. E., & Love, J. R. (2009). Increasing vocal variability in children with autism using a lag schedule of reinforcement. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25, 73–78.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Goetz, E. M., & Baer, D. M. (1973). Social control of form diversity and emergence of new forms in children’s blockbuilding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 209–217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Grow, L. L., Kelley, M. E., Roane, H. S., & Shillingsburg, M. A. (2008). Utility of extinction-induced response variability for the selection of mands. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 15–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Grunow, A., & Neuringer, A. (2002). Learning to vary and varying to learn. Psycho-nomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lalli, J. S., Zanolli, K., & Wohn, T. (1994). Using extinction to promote response variability in toy play. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 735–736.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee, R., McComas, J. J., & Jawor, J. (2002). The effects of differential and lag reinforcement schedules on varied verbal responding by individuals with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 391–402.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Neuringer, A. (1993). Reinforced variation and selection. Animal Learning and Behavior, 21, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Neuringer, A. (2002). Operant variability: Evidence, functions, and theory. Psychometric Bulletin & Review, 9, 672–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Page, S., & Neuringer, A. (1985). Variability is an operant. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 429–452.Google Scholar
  14. Pryor, K. W., Haag, R., & O’Reilly, J. (1969). The creative porpoise: Training for novel behavior. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 653–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schwartz, B. (1980). Development of complex stereotyped behaviors in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 33, 153–166.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Acton, MA: Copley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California Unified Service Providers, L.L.CUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyCalifornia State University, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations