The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 101–110 | Cite as

The Effects of Tact Training on Stereotypic Vocalizations in Children With Autism

  • Erin M. Guzinski
  • Traci M. Cihon
  • John Eshleman
Article

Abstract

This study was a systematic extension of Karmali, Greer, Nuzzulo-Gomez, Ross, and Rivera-Valdes (2005) and Ahearn, Clark, MacDonald, and Chung (2007). We investigated the effects of a tact correction procedure on stereotypic vocalizations in 4 children diagnosed with autism who ranged in age from 6 to 16 years. Participants had limited vocal verbal repertoires and were primarily dependent on prompts for the emission of appropriate vocalizations. A multiple-baseline design across participants was used. Data were collected on instances of stereotypic vocalizations and independent tacts during baseline conditions and on instances of stereotypic vocalizations, independent tacts, and echoic-tacts during intervention. Procedural integrity and social validity data were also obtained. The results indicated a decrease in stereotypic vocalizations for 3 of the 4 participants and a slight increase in appropriate vocal verbal behavior (i.e., tacting) for all participants. The study provides support for the use of tact correction procedures to decrease stereotypic vocalizations and increase appropriate vocalizations in children with autism.

Key words

autism echoics stereotypic vocalizations tacts tact correction verbal behavior 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahearn, W. H., Clark, K. M., MacDonald, R. F., & Chung, B. I. (2007). Assessing and treating stereotypic vocalizations in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 263–275.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bondy, A., Tincani, M., & Frost, L. (2004). Multiply controlled verbal operants: An analysis and extension to the picture exchange communication system. The Behavior Analyst, 27(2), 247–261.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Cunningham, A. B., & Schreibman, L. (2008). Stereotypy in autism: The importance of function. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2(3), 469–479.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Foxx, R. M., Faw, G. D., McMorrow, M. J., Kyle, M. S., & Bittle, R. G. (1988). Replacing maladaptive speech with verbal labeling responses: An analysis of generalized responding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 411–417.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Karmali, I. L., Greer, R. D., Nuzzulo-Gomez, R., Ross, D. E., Rivera-Valdes, C. (2005). Reducing palilalia by presenting tact corrections to young children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 145–153.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Karsten, A. M., & Carr, J. E. (2009). The effects of differential reinforcement of unprompted responding on the skill acquisition of children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 327–334.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Kennedy, C. H., Meyer, K. A., Knowles, T., & Shukla, S. (2000). Analyzing the multiple functions of stereo-typical behavior for students with autism: Implications for assessment and treatment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 559–571.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Lerman, D. C., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). A methodology for distinguishing between extention and punishment effects associated with response blocking. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 231–233.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu-Gitz, L., & Banda, D. R. (2010). A replication of the RIRD strategy to decrease vocal stereotypy in a student with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 25(1), 77–87.Google Scholar
  11. Mace, F. C., Browder, D. M., & Lin, Y. (1987). Analysis of demand conditions associated with stereotypy. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 18, 25–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Miguel, C. F., Clark, K., Tereshko, L., & Ahearn, W. H. (2009). The effects of response interruption and redirection and sertraline on stereotypic vocalizations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(4), 883–888.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Pistoljevic, N., & Greer, R. D. (2006). The effects of daily intensive tact instruction on preschool students’ emission of pure tacts and mands in non-instructional setting. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 3, 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schreibman, L., & Carr, E. G. (1978). Elimination of echolalic responding to questions through the training of a generalized verbal response. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 453–463.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Cambridge, MA: B. F. Skinner Foundation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith, R. G., Russo, L., & Le, D. D. (1999). Distinguishing between extinction and punishment effects of response blocking: a replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 367–370.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Wing, L., & Gould, J. (1979). Severe impairments of social interaction and associated abnormalities in children: Epidemiology and classification. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9, 11–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erin M. Guzinski
    • 1
  • Traci M. Cihon
    • 1
  • John Eshleman
    • 1
  1. 1.The Chicago School of Professional PsychologyUSA

Personalised recommendations