Advertisement

The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 83–99 | Cite as

Multiple Exemplar Instruction and the Emergence of Generative Production of Suffixes as Autoclitic Frames

  • JeanneMarie Speckman
  • R. Douglas Greer
  • Celestina Rivera-Valdes
Article

Abstract

We report 2 experiments that tested the effects of multiple exemplar instruction (MEI) across training sets on the emergence of productive autoclitic frames (suffixes) for 6 preschoolers with and without language-based disabilities. We implemented multiple exemplar tact instruction with subsets of stimuli whose “names” contained the suffix “-er” denoting the comparative form of adjectives. Subsets of stimuli included regular, irregular, and contrived tacts containing the target relational autoclitic frame in order to determine if our MEI procedure would induce the abstraction of the frame across all stimulus sets. In the second experiment, additional tasks were introduced to the participants to control for a possible sequence effect. A nonconcurrent multiple probe design was used to evaluate the functional relation between MEI and emergence of untaught tact responses containing the comparative adjective “-er.” The results of both experiments showed relations between MEI and novel, untaught tact responses containing the target autoclitic frame; the second experiment showing a functional relation. The results are discussed in terms of environmental sources for productive verbal behavior.

Key words

verbal behavior autoclitics multiple exemplar instruction grammar suffixes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. The Big Box of Art. (2002). [Computer software]. Hull, Quebec, Canada: Hemera Technologies.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, A. K., Brown, J. L., & Poulson, C. L. (1995). Generalization of children’s identity matching to sample performances to novel stimuli. The Psychological Record, 45, 29–43.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Catania, A. C. (1998). Learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mounton: The Hague.Google Scholar
  7. Eby, C. (2011). The role of adult attention in the reinforcement of tacts emitted by preschoolers (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Emurian, H. H., Hu, X., Wang, J., & Durham, D. (2000). Learning JAVA: A programmed instruction approach using applets. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fields, L., Reeve, K. F., Matneja, P., Varelas, A., Belanida, J., Fitzer, A., & Shamoun, K. (2002). The formation of a generalized categorization repertoire: Effect of training with multiple domains, samples and comparisons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 291–313.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Fiorile, C. A., & Greer, R. D. (2007). The induction of naming in children with no echoic-to-tact responses as a function of multiple exemplar instruction. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 23, 71–88.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Freidin, R. (1992). Foundations of generative syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gena, A., Krantz, P. J., McClannahan, L. E., & Poulson, C. L. (1996). Training and generalization of affective behavior displayed by youth with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 291–304.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilic, L., & Greer, R.D. (2011). Establishing naming in typically developing children as a function of multiple exemplar speaker and listener experiences. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 157–178.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Gorham, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holes, D. & Berens, N. (2009). Derived comparative and transitive relations in young children with and without autism. Psychological Record, 59, 221–246.Google Scholar
  15. Greer, R. D. (2002). Designing teaching strategies. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Greer, R. D., Corwin, A., & Buttigieg, S. (2011). The effects of the verbal developmental capability of naming on how children can be taught. Acta de Investigation Psicologia, 1(1), 23–54.Google Scholar
  17. Greer, R. D., & Keohane, D. D. (2005). The evolution of verbal behavior in young children. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 1, 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greer, R. D., & Longano, J. (2010). Naming a rose: How we may learn to do it. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 26, 73–106.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Greer, R. D., & McDonough, S. (1999). Is the learn unit the fundamental measure of pedagogy? The Behavior Analyst, 20, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greer, R. D., Stolfi. L., & Pistoljevic, N. (2007). Emergence of naming in preschoolers: A comparison and multiple and single exemplar instruction. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 8, 119–131.Google Scholar
  21. Greer, R. D., & Yuan, L. (2008). How kids learn to say the darnedest things: The effects of multiple exemplar instruction on novel verb usage. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 24, 103–121.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Greer, R. D., Yuan, L., & Gautreaux, G. (2005). Novel dictation and intraverbal responses as a function of a multiple exemplar history. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 99–116.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Hart, B. M., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday life of America’s children. Baltimore: Paul Brookes.Google Scholar
  24. Hayes, S. C., & Barnes, D. (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 235–243.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.) (2001). Relational frame theory. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Home, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Howard, J. S., & Rice, D. E. (1988). Establishing a generalized autoclitic repertoire in preschool children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 1988, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ingham, P., & Greer, R. D. (1992). Changes in student and teacher responses in observed and generalized settings as a function of supervisor observations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 153–164.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luke, N., Greer, R. D., Singer-Dudek, J., & Keohane, D. (2011). The emergence of autoclitic frames in typically and atypi-cally developing children as a function of multiple exemplar instruction. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 141–156.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Hora, D., Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Smeets, P. (2002). Response latencies to multiple derived relations: Testing two predictions of relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 52, 51–76.Google Scholar
  32. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Rosetti, L. (1990). The Rosetti Infant-Toddler Language Scale. East Moline, IL: Lingui Systems.Google Scholar
  34. Schmelzkopf, J. (2010). Emergence of approval as a socially conditioned reinforcer and effects on emission of vocal verbal operants by three- and four-year-old children. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.) Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Acton, MA: Copley Publishing Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Steele, D. L., & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Twyman, J. (1996). The functional independence of impure mands and tacts of abstract stimulus properties. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 1–19.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Wagner, C. R. (1985). How much do children say in a day? Journal of Child Language, 12, 475–487.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • JeanneMarie Speckman
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. Douglas Greer
    • 2
    • 3
  • Celestina Rivera-Valdes
    • 1
  1. 1.Fred S. Keller SchoolNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Columbia University Teachers CollegeUSA
  3. 3.Graduate School of Arts and SciencesUSA

Personalised recommendations