Skip to main content
Log in

Grammatical Constructions in Typical Developing Children: Effects of Explicit Reinforcement, Automatic Reinforcement and Parity

  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study replicated and extended Wright (2006) and Whitehurst, Ironsmith, and Goldfein (1974) by examining whether preschool aged children would increase their use of passive grammatical voice rather than using the more age-appropriate active grammatical construction when the former was modeled by an adult. Results showed that 5 of the 6 participants began using the passive voice after this verbal behavior had been modeled. For 3 of the participants, this change was large. The change occurred even though the adult model explicitly rewarded the participant with praise and stickers for using the active voice, while providing no praise or stickers for using the passive form that was modeled. For 1 participant, the modeling procedure had no effect on use of the passive voice. These results indicate a strong automatic reinforcement effect of achieving parity with the grammatical structures used by adults, compared to the effects of explicit reinforcement by the adult. This might help to explain why children acquire grammatical structures prevalent in their language community apparently without explicit instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, S. E., & Crago, M. B. (1996). Early passive acquisition in Inuktitut. Journal of Child Language, 23, 129–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, R. A. (1985). The acquisition of Hebrew. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslin-guistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 1, pp. 255–371). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Hanion, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 11–53). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (2007). Learning (4th ed.). New York: Sloan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demuth, K. (1989). Maturation and the acquisition of the Sesotho passive. Journal of the Linguistic Society of America, 65, 56–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Home P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). Naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchman, V. A., Bates, E., Burkardt, A., & Good, A. B. (1991). Functional constraints of the acquisition of the passive: Toward a model of the competence to perform. First Language, 11, 65–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moerk, E. L. (1983). A behavior analysis of controversial topics in first language acquisition: Reinforcement, corrections, modeling, input frequencies, and the three-term contingency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12, 129–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, G., & Peláez, M. (2004). Child and adolescent development: A behavioral systems approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. C. (1996). Achieving parity: The role of automatic reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 183–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. C. (1998). The speaker as listener: The interpretation of structural regularities in verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15, 3–16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., Michael, J., & Sundberg, C. A. (1996). Automatic reinforcement automatic punishment in infant vocal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 39–48.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L., Michael, J., Partington, J. W., & Sundberg, C. A. (1996). The role of automatic reinforcement in early language acquisition. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 21–37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Trosborg, A. (1982). Reversibility and the acquisition of complex syntactic structures in 3- to 7-year-old children. First Language, 3, 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, M. E., & Michael, J. (1982). Automatic reinforcement: An important but ignored concept. Behaviorism, 10, 211–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. J., Ironsmith, M., & Goldfein, M. (1974). Selective imitation of the passive construction through modeling. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 17, 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A. N. (2006). The role of modeling and automatic reinforcement in the construction of the passive voice. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 153–169.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svein Eikeseth.

Additional information

This study is based on a thesis submitted by the first author to the Graduate Faculty of Akershus University College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of science.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Østvik, L., Eikeseth, S. & Klintwall, L. Grammatical Constructions in Typical Developing Children: Effects of Explicit Reinforcement, Automatic Reinforcement and Parity. Analysis Verbal Behav 28, 73–82 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393108

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393108

Key words

Navigation