The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 17–27 | Cite as

Some Issues in Infant Speech Perception: Do the Means Justify the Ends?

Article

Abstract

A major focus of research on language acquisition in infancy involves experimental studies of the infant’s ability to discriminate various kinds of speech or speech-like stimuli. This research has demonstrated that infants are sensitive to many fine-grained differences in the acoustic properties of speech utterances. Furthermore, these empirical findings have led investigators to theorize about how the infants internally process and represent speech stimuli. This paper examines one particular experimental protocol frequently used in these experiments: the Head-Turn Preference Procedure. It will be shown that this procedure is methodologically flawed and the theoretical conclusions drawn from its results are not adequately warranted.

Key words

infant speech perception head-turn preference procedure familiarization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chambers, K. E., Onishi, K. H., & Fisher, C. (2003). Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience. Cognition, 87, B69–B77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohen, L. B. (1972). Attention-getting and attention-holding processing of infant visual preferences. Child Development, 43, 869–879.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, L. B. (1976). Habituation of infant visual attention. In T. J. Tighe & R. N. Leaton (Eds.), Habituation: Perspectives from child development, animal behavior, and neurophysiology (pp. 207–238). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Jusczyk, P. W. (1998). The Discovery of Language. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Kuhl, P. K., Andruski, J. E., Chistovich, I. A., Kozhevnikova, E. V., Ryskina, V., Stolyarova, E. I., Sundberg, U., & Lacerda, F. (1997). Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants, Science, 277, 684–686.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Malcuit, G., Bastien, C., & Pomerleau, A. (1996). Habituation of the orienting response to stimuli of different functional values in 4-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 271–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Malcuit, G., & Pomerleau, A. (1996). Operant learning and habituation in infants. In S. W. Bijou and E. Ribes (Eds.), New directions in behavior development (pp. 47–72). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  8. McMurray, B., & Aslin, R. N. (2005). Infants are sensitive to within-category variation in speech perception. Cognition, 95, B15–B26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nelson, D. G. K., Juscyzk, P., Mandel, D. R., Myers, J., Turk, A., & Gerken, L. (1995). The head-turn preference procedure for testing auditory perception, Infant Behavior and Development, 18, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Onishi, K. H., Chambers, K. E., & Fisher, C. (2002). Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience. Cognition, 83, B13–B23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Polka, L., P.W. Jusczyk, & S. Rvachew (1995). Methods for studying speech perception in infants and children. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 49–89). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
  12. Schlinger, H. D. (1995). A behavior analytic view of child development. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shibamoto, J. S. & Olmsted, D. L. (1978). Lexical and syllabic patterns in phonological acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 5, 417–456.Google Scholar
  14. Shvachkin, N. K. H. (1973). The development of phonemic speech perception in early childhood. In C. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 91–127). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  15. Skinner, B. F. (1989). The listener. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 85–96). Reno, NV: Context Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsCalifornia State UniversityFresnoUSA

Personalised recommendations