Advertisement

The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 171–181 | Cite as

Generalization of Relational Matching to Sample in Children: A Direct Replication

Article

Abstract

The ability of preschool age children to perform generalized relational matching to sample tasks with and without an overt mediating stimulus was examined. This experiment was a direct replication of a study by Lowenkron (1984) and examined a behavioral model relevant to complex human behavior that he later came to call joint control. Children were trained to code two-dimensional stimuli with the help of a handheld mediating stimulus. They were later tested for generalization of relational matching to sample with and without the mediating stimulus. Results indicated high levels of generalized matching to sample with the mediating stimulus and lower levels without. Findings also indicated that generalization was somewhat stronger with symmetrical shapes than with asymmetrical. Results are discussed in terms of a radical behavioral interpretation of complex human behavior.

Key words

naturalistic teaching approaches (NTA) applied verbal behavior (AVB) natural environment training (NET) natural language paradigm (NLP) pivotal response training (PRT) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baars, B. J. (1988). A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. New York: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Barsalou, L. W. (1992). Cognitive Psychology: An Overview for Cognitive Scientists. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Lowenkron, B. (1984). Coding responses and the generalization of matching to sample in children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 1–18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. O’Donohue, W. T., Ferguson, K. E. & Naugle, A.E. (2003). The structure of the cognitive revolution. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 85–110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Prentice Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Skinner, B. F. (1987). Whatever happened to psychology as a science of behavior? American Psychologist, 42, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western Michigan University, Garden AcademyMontclairUSA

Personalised recommendations