Rudimentary Reading Repertoires via Stimulus Equivalence and Recombination of Minimal Verbal Units
We report a study with sixteen low-SES Brazilian children that sought to establish a repertoire of relations involving dictated words, printed words, and corresponding pictures. Children were taught: (1) in response to dictated words, to select corresponding pictures; (2) in response to syllables presented in both visual and auditory formats, to select words which contained a corresponding syllable in either the first or the last position; (3) in response to dictated-word samples, to “construct” corresponding printed words via arranging their constituent syllabic components; and (4) in response to printed word samples, to construct identical printed words by arranging their syllabic constituents. After training on the first two types of tasks, children were given tests for potentially emergent relations involving printed words and pictures. Almost all exhibited relations consistent with stimulus equivalence. They also displayed emergent naming performances—not only with training words but also with new words that were recombinations of their constituent syllables. The present work was inspired by Sidman’s stimulus equivalence paradigm and by Skinner’s functional analysis of verbal relations, particularly as applied to conceptions of minimal behavioral units and creativity (i.e., behavioral flexibility) in the analytical units applied to verbal relations.
Key wordsRudimentary reading stimulus equivalence minimal verbal units unit recombination
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blachman, B. A. (1997). Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- de Rose, J., de Souza, D. G., Rossito, A. L., & de Rose, T. M. S. (1992). Stimulus equivalence and generalization in reading after matching to sample by exclusion. In S.C. Hayes & L.J. Hayes (Eds.) Understanding verbal relations (pp. 69–82). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
- Goldstein, H. (1993). Structuring environmental input to facilitate generalized language learning by children with mental retardation. In A. P. Kaiser & D. B. Gray (Eds.), Enhancing children’s communication: Research foundations for intervention (Vol. 2, pp. 317–334). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
- Mackay, H. A., Kotlarchyk, B. J., & Stromer, R. (1997). Stimulus classes, stimulus sequences, and generative behavior. In E. M. Pinkston & D. M. Baer (Eds.), Environment and behavior (pp. 124–137). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Mackay, H. A., & Sidman, M. (1984). Teaching new behavior via equivalence relations. In B. Sperber, C. MacCauley, & P. H. Brookes (Eds.), Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 493–513). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Matos, M. A. & Hübner-D’Oliveira, M. M. (1992). Equivalence relations and reading. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding Verbal Relations. Reno, NV: Context Press, pp. 83–94.Google Scholar
- Matos, M. A., Hübner, M. M. & Peres, W. (1997). Leitura generalizada: procedimentos e resultados (Generalized reading: procedures and methods). In R. A. Banaco (Ed.), Comportamento e Cognitpo, Volume I: Questões Teóricas, Metodológicas e de Formatpo. Campinas: ARBytes, pp. 470–487.Google Scholar
- Matos, M. A., Peres, W., Hübner, M. M., & Malheiros, R. H. S. (1999). Oralizatpo e cópia: Efeitos sobre a aquisitpo de leitura generalizada recombinativa (Naming and copying: Effects on the acquisition of generalized recombinative reading). Temas em Psicologia, 1, 47–64.Google Scholar
- Matos, M. A., Hübner, M. M., Serra, V. R. B. P., Basaglia, A. E., & Avanzi, A. L. (2002). Redes de relat)es condicionais e leitura recombinativa: Pesquisando o ensinar a ler (Networks of conditional relations and recombinative reading: Researching reading instruction). Arquivos Brazileiros de Psicologia, 54, 284–303.Google Scholar
- McIlvane, W. J., Dube, W. V., Kledaras, J. B., Iennaco, F. M., & Stoddard, L. T. (1989). Stimulus-consequence relations and stimulus classes in mental retardation. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 7, 17–20.Google Scholar
- McIlvane, W. J., Serna, R. W., Dube, W. V., & Stromer, R. (2000). Stimulus control topography coherence and stimulus equivalence: Reconciling test outcomes with theory. In J. Leslie & D. E. Blackman (Eds.), Issues in experimental and applied analyses of human behavior (pp. 85–110). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
- Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Danville, CA: Behavior Analysts, Inc.Google Scholar