The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 43–58 | Cite as

Evaluating Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing and Direct Reinforcement in the Establishment of an Echoic Repertoire of Children Diagnosed with Autism

Article

Abstract

Many children with autism do not imitate adult vocalizations, an important skill in learning to talk. Pairing adult vocalizations with preferred stimuli has been shown to increase free-operant vocalizations but effects are temporary; thus, direct reinforcement may be necessary to establish durable vocal behaviors. In Experiment 1, directly reinforced echoic responses did not increase following stimulus-stimulus pairings in three children with autism. Similarly, pairings did not increase free-operant vocalizations in Experiment 2, a replication of Miguel et al. (2002). Experiment 3 demonstrated that shaping increased vowel frequency for one participant. Results suggest that variables are yet to be delineated that influence effectiveness of a stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure on vocalization frequency and acquisition of a verbal operant following such pairings.

Key words

stimulus-stimulus pairing automatic reinforcement verbal behavior autism speech training 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bijou, S. W., & Baer, D. M. (1965). Child development: Vol. 2. Universal stage of infancy. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bzoch, K. R., League, R., & Brown, V. L. (2003). Receptive-expressive emergent language test (3rd ed.}). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, J. E., Nicolson, A. C., & Higbee, T. S. (2000). Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 353–357.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Fantino, E. (1981). Contiguity, response strength, and the delay-reduction hypothesis. In P. Harzem & J. H. Zeiler, (Eds.), Predictability, correlation, and contiguity (pp. 169–201). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., & Amari, A. (1996). Integrating caregiver report with a systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 101, 15–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Frost, L. A., & Bondy, A. S. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Cherry Hill, NJ: Pyramid Educational Consultants, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Galensky, T. L., Miltenberger, R. G., Stricker, J. M., & Garlinghouse, M. A. (2001). Functional assessment and treatment of mealtime behavior problems. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 3, 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hayes, S. C., Barlow, D. H., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1999). The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in the age of managed care (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  12. International Phonetic Association (1999). Handbook of the international phonetic association: A guide to the use of the International phonetic alphabet. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kaufman, N. R. (1995). Kaufman speech praxis test. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ling, D. (1976). Speech and the hearing impaired child: Theory and practice. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.Google Scholar
  15. Ling, D. (1989). Foundations of spoken language for hearing-impaired children. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.Google Scholar
  16. Lovaas, O. I. (1981). Teaching developmentally disabled children: The me book. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  17. Miguel, C. F., Carr, J. E., & Michael, J. (2002). The effects of a stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure on the vocal behavior of children diagnosed with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 3–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Moerk, E. L. (1990). Three-term contingency patterns in mother-child verbal interactions during first language acquisition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 293–305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Palmer, D. C. (1996). Achieving parity: The role of automatic reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 289–290.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: William Morrow & Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schlinger, H. D., Jr. (1995). A behavior analytic view of child development. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith, R., Michael, J., & Sundberg, M. L. (1996). Automatic reinforcement and automatic punishment in infant vocal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 39–48.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Sundberg, M. L., Michael, J., Partington, J. W., & Sundberg, C. A. (1996). The role of automatic reinforcement in early language acquisition. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 21–37.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Pleasant Hill, CA: Behavior Analysts, Inc.Google Scholar
  26. Vaughan, M. E., & Michael, J. (1982). Automatic reinforcement: An important but ignored concept. Behaviorism, 10, 217–227.Google Scholar
  27. Yoon, S., & Bennett, G. M. (2000). Effects of a stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure on conditioning vocal sounds as reinforcers. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 17, 75–88.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara E. Esch
    • 1
  • James E. Carr
    • 1
  • Jack Michael
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWestern Michigan UniversityKalamazooUSA

Personalised recommendations