The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 27–41 | Cite as

The Effects of Multiple-Tact and Receptive-Discrimination Training on the Acquisition of Intraverbal Behavior

  • Caio F. Miguel
  • Anna Ingeborg Petursdottir
  • James E. Carr
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether multiple-tact training and receptive-discrimination training could be used to teach thematically related vocal intraverbals to typically developing preschool children. Multiple-tact training involved teaching a child to name both the item and the category to which the item belonged. Receptive-discrimination training consisted of teaching a child to select a picture card in the presence of a question from the experimenter regarding the item or its category. When neither of these strategies resulted in substantial increases in intraverbal responses, a typical intraverbal training protocol using tact prompts was implemented. Six typically developing children participated in the study. A multiple-baseline design across word categories was used to evaluate the effects of the three training procedures. Results indicated that both multiple-tact and receptive-discrimination training had minimal effects on the strength of the intraverbal repertoire, whereas direct intraverbal training had a more substantial effect. The results provide some evidence of the functional independence of verbal operants, as well as the independence of listener and speaker repertoires. Receptive-discrimination and multiple-tact training may have facilitated acquisition of intraverbals; however, further research is needed to assess how these repertoires might interact with each other.

Key Words

intraverbal tact receptive discrimination verbal behavior language development and typically-developing children 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Cullinan, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 69–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Barsalou, L. W. (1992). Cognitive psychology: An overview for cognitive scientists. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Braam, S. J., & Poling, A. (1983). Development of intraverbal behavior in mentally retarded individuals through a transfer of stimulus control procedures: Classification of verbal responses. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 4, 279–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fraser, C., Bellugi, U., & Brown, R. (1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Green, G., & Saunders, R. R. (1998). Stimulus equivalence. In K. A. Lattal & M. Perone (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior (pp. 229–262). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hall, G. A., & Chase, P. N. (1991). The relationship between stimulus equivalence and verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9, 107–119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post- Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  8. Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185–241.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Horne, P. J., Lowe, C. F., & Randle, V. R. L. (2004). Naming and categorization in young children: II. Listener behavior training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81, 267–288.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Lowe, C. F., P. J., Harris, F. D. A., & Randle, V. R. L. (2002). Naming and categorization in young children: Vocal tact training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 527–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Luciano, M. C. (1986). Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of productive intraverbal behavior through a transfer of stimulus control procedures. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 7, 1–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. McCarthy, D. (1970). McCarthy scales of children’s abilities. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  13. Miguel, C. F., Petursdottir, A. I., Carr, J. E., & Michael, J. (2005, May). The role of verbal behavior in stimulus categorization by preschool children. In C. F. Miguel (Chair), Basic and applied research on verbal behavior and emergent relations. Symposium conducted at the 31st Annual Convention of The Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. Normand, M. P., Fossa, J. F., & Poling, A. (2000). Publication trends in The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 17, 167–173.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Partington, J. W., & Bailey, J. S. (1993). Teaching intraverbal behavior to preschool children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 11, 9–18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Pleasant Hill, CA: Behavior Analysts, Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Watkins, C. L., Pack-Teixteira, L., & Howard, J. S. (1989). Teaching intraverbal behavior to severely retarded children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 83–99.Google Scholar
  19. Wacker, D. P. (1996). Behavior analysis research in JABA: A need for studies that bridge basic and applied research. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 14, 11–14.Google Scholar
  20. Wynn, J. W., & Smith, T. (2003). Generalization between receptive and expressive language in young children with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 18, 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caio F. Miguel
    • 1
  • Anna Ingeborg Petursdottir
    • 1
  • James E. Carr
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWestern Michigan UniversityKalamazooUSA

Personalised recommendations