The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 129–134 | Cite as

Notation Systems for Reading and Writing Sign Language

  • Amy L. McCarty
Article

Abstract

Without written forms, signed languages do not permit the type of textual record available to speakers of English and other written languages. Deaf signers have generally relied on the language of the dominant hearing culture for this purpose. Because of their visual-gestural modality, signed languages present a unique set of challenges for developing written forms. These issues are considered from a behavioral perspective, and two sign language notation systems, Stokoe Notation and Sutton SignWriting, are described.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Battison, R. (1974). Phonological deletion in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 5, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battison, R. (1978). Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstock Press.Google Scholar
  3. Charteris, L. (1972). Paleneo: A Universal Sign Language. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  4. Flood, C.M. (2002). How do deaf and hard of hearing students experience learning to write using SignWriting, a way to read and write signs? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
  5. Friedman, L. (1977). Formational properties of American Sign Language. In L.A. Friedman (Ed.), On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gangel-Vasquez, Janice (1997). Assessing written sign recognition skills at the Escuelita de Bluefields. Literacy in Nicaraguan sign language. Unpublished master’s thesis, California State University, Dominguez Hills.Google Scholar
  7. Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1993). The theory behind the dictionary: Cultural literacy and education. In Hirsch, E. D., Jr., Klett, J. F., & Trefìl, J. (Eds.), The dictionary of cultural literacy (pp. xi–xv). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  8. Humphries, T., Padden, C., & O’Rourke, T. J., (1980). A basic course in American Sign LanGoogle Scholar
  9. Klima, E., & Bellugi, U. (1979). The Signs of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Klima, E. S. (1975). Sound and its absence in the linguistic symbol. In J. F. Kavanagh and J. E. Cutting (Eds.), The role of speech in language. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  11. Martin, J. (2000). Stokoe notation & Sutton SignWriting. Western Washington University. Retrieved January 10,2004, from http://signwriting.org/library/pdf/pdf/sw0032%20Comp%20Stokoe%20Sutton.pdf.Google Scholar
  12. Sign Writing in Denmark. Retrieved January 10, 2004, from http://www.signwriting.org/forums/research/rese002.html and http://www.signwriting.org/forums/research/ rese002.html.
  13. Sign Writing Literacy Projectfor Deaf Children Retrieved January 10, 2004, from http://www.signwriting.org/archive/docsl/sw0028-Proposal-2001.pdf.
  14. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stokoe, W. C. (1960). Sign language structure. An outline of the visual communication system of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics Occasional Papers 8. Buffalo: Department of Anthropology and Linguistics, University of Buffalo. (Reprinted Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  16. Stokoe, W. C. (1978). Sign language structure. (rev. ed.) Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
  17. Stokoe, W. C., Casterline, D.C., & Croneberg, C. G. (1965). A dictionary of American Sign Language on linguistic principles. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Sutton, V. (1981). Sign writing for everyday use. Newport Beach: Sutton Movement Writing Press.Google Scholar
  19. Thompson, D. (1993). Early intervention and deafness—school/home partnerships—after ten years, how are they working? In O. M. Welch (Ed.), Research and practice in deafness: Issues and questions in education, psychology, and vocational service provision, (pp. 5–27). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  20. Tucek, R. V. (1982). Toward the development of a writing system for American Sign Language. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  21. Woodward, J. (1972). Implications for sociolinguistic research among the deaf. Sign Language Studies, 1, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy L. McCarty
    • 1
  1. 1.HollandUSA

Personalised recommendations