The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 111–128 | Cite as

Dialogue on Private Events

  • David C. Palmer
  • John Eshleman
  • Paul Brandon
  • T. V. Joe Layng
  • Christopher McDonough
  • Jack Michael
  • Ted Schoneberger
  • Nathan Stemmer
  • Ray Weitzman
  • Matthew Normand
Article

Abstract

In the fall of 2003, the authors corresponded on the topic of private events on the listserv of the Verbal Behavior Special Interest Group. Extracts from that correspondence raised questions about the role of response amplitude in determining units of analysis, whether private events can be investigated directly, and whether covert behavior differs from other behavior except in amplitude. Most participants took a cautious stance, noting not only conceptual pitfalls and empirical difficulties in the study of private events, but doubting the value of interpretive exercises about them. Others argued that despite such obstacles, in domains where experimental analyses cannot be done, interpretation of private events in the light of laboratory principles is the best that science can offer. One participant suggested that the notion that private events can be behavioral in nature be abandoned entirely; as an alternative, the phenomena should be reinterpreted only as physiological events.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Byrne, J. H. (1987). Cellular analysis of associative learning. Physiological Reviews, 67, 329–439.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Calkin, A. B. (2002). Inner behavior: Empirical investigations of private events. The Behavior Analyst, 25, 255–259.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  4. Donahoe, J. W. & Palmer, D. C. (1989). The interpretation of complex human behavior: Some reactions to Parallel Distributed Processing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 399–416.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards, D. D. & Edwards, J. S. (1970). Fetal movement: Development and time course. Science, 169, 95–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Flanagan, B., Goldiamond, I., & Azrin, N. (1959). Instatement of stuttering in normally fluent individuals through operant procedures. Science, 120, 979–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hawkins, R. D. & Kandel, E. R. (1984). Is there a cell-biological alphabet for simple forms of learning? Psychological Review, 91, 375–391.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kripke, S. A. (1982). Wittgenstein: On rules and private language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Layng, T. V. J. (1995). Causation and complexity: Old lessons, new crusades. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26, 249–258,.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Palmer, D. C. (1991). A behavioral interpretation of memory. In L. J. Hayes and P. N. Chase (Eds.) Dialogs on verbal behavior (pp. 261–279), Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  11. Palmer, D. C. (1998). The speaker as listener: The interpretation of structural regularities in verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15, 3–16.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Palmer, D. C. (2004, in press). Cognition. In K. A. Lattai and P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy, New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
  13. Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  14. Quine, W. V. (1966). The ways of paradox and other essays. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  15. Quine, W. V. (1974). The roots of reference. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  16. Quine, W.V. (1975). Mind and verbal dispositions. In S. Guttenplan (Ed.), Mind and language (pp. 83–95). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Skinner, B. F. (1988). Replies to commentators. In A. C. Catania & S. Hamad (Eds.), The selection of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Sober, E. (1993). Philosophy of biology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  21. Stemmer, N. (1992). Skinner and a solution to the problem of inner states. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 115–128.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Stemmer, N. (1995). Explanatory and predictive roles of inner events: A reply to Overskeid. The Psychological Record, 45, 349–354.Google Scholar
  23. Stemmer, N. (2001). The Mind-Body problem and Quine’s repudiation theory. Behavior and Philosophy, 29, 187–202.Google Scholar
  24. Stemmer, N. (in press). Covert behavior and mental terms: A reply to Moore. Behavior and Philosophy.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • David C. Palmer
    • 1
  • John Eshleman
    • 2
  • Paul Brandon
    • 3
  • T. V. Joe Layng
    • 4
  • Christopher McDonough
    • 5
  • Jack Michael
    • 6
  • Ted Schoneberger
    • 7
  • Nathan Stemmer
    • 8
  • Ray Weitzman
    • 9
  • Matthew Normand
    • 10
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySmith CollegeNorthamptonUSA
  2. 2.APEX ConsultingUSA
  3. 3.Minnesota State UniversityUSA
  4. 4.Headsprout, Inc.USA
  5. 5.Hawthorne Country Day SchoolUSA
  6. 6.Western Michigan UniversityUSA
  7. 7.California State University: StanislausUSA
  8. 8.Bar-Han UniversityUSA
  9. 9.California State University: FresnoUSA
  10. 10.Florida Institute of TechnologyUSA

Personalised recommendations