The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 37–43 | Cite as

Towards a Balanced Account of Autism Etiology

  • Genae A. Hall
Article

Abstract

Drash and Tudor describe six sets of reinforcement contingencies which may be present in the environments of some children eventually diagnosed with autism and suggest that these contingencies account for the etiology of “autistic” behaviors. Nevertheless, merely observing such contingencies in the environments of these children is insufficient to establish a positive correlation between the contingencies and “autistic” behaviors, let alone a causal relationship. To demonstrate a positive correlation, it is necessary to present evidence that the relevant contingencies are present more often in the environments of children exhibiting these behaviors than in the environments of children not exhibiting these behaviors. This condition has not been met, since no evidence to the effect that such contingencies are absent in the environments of typical children or children with disabilities other than autism has been presented. In fact, the opposite appears to be true, as is argued in the present commentary. It appears that Drash and Tudor’s account of autism etiology is incomplete in that it neglects the role of unlearned differences between children and their possible interactions with the social environment in shaping “autistic” behaviors. Despite the misconception held by some that behavior analysis is a radically environmental approach, unlearned differences may be discussed within a behavioral framework. A “completely behavioral” account may discuss such differences in terms of susceptibility to reinforcement or punishment, speed of conditioning, or other unlearned characteristics which are potentially testable.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barkley, Russell A. (2000). Taking charge of ADHD: The complete, authoritative guide for parents. New York/London: Guilford.Google Scholar
  2. Bijou, Sidney W., & Ghezzi, Patrick M. (1999). The behavioral interference theory of autistic behavior in young children. In P. M. Ghezzi, W. L. Williams, & J. E. Carr (Eds.), Autism: Behavior analytic perspectives (pp. 33–43). Reno: Context.Google Scholar
  3. Catania, A. Charles (1998). Learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. DeMeyer, M. K., Hingtgen, J. N., & Jackson, R. K. (1981). Infantile autism reviewed: A decade of research. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 7, 388–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Forehand, Rex L., & McMahon, Robert J. (1981) Helping the noncompliant child: A clinician s guide to parent training. New York/London: Guilford.Google Scholar
  6. Gillberg, Christopher, & Coleman, Mary (1992). The biology of the autistic syndromes. Oxford/New York: Mac Keith Press.Google Scholar
  7. Green, Gina (1996). Early behavioral intervention for autism: What does the research tell us? In C. M. Maurice, G. Green, & S.C. Luce (Eds.), Behavioral intervention for young children with autism (pp. 29–44). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  8. Hart, Betty, & Risley, Todd R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore/ London/Toronto/Sydney: Brooks.Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, S. M., Wahl, G., Martin, S., & Johansson, S. (1973). How deviant is the normal child? A behavioral analysis of the preschool child and his family. In R. D. Rubin, J. P. Brady, & J. D. Henderson (Eds.), Advances in behavior therapy (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Koegel, L. K., Valdez-Menchaca, M. C., and Koel, R. L. (1994). Autism: Social communication difficulties and related behaviors. In V. B. Van Hasselt & M. Herson (Eds.), Advanced abnormal psychology (pp. 165–187). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lovaas, O. Ivar (2003). Teaching individuals with developmental delays: Basic intervention techniques. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  12. Lovass, O. Ivar, & Smith, T. (1989). A comprehensive behavior theory of autistic children: Paradigm for research and treatment. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 20, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Peterson, N. (1960). Control of behavior by presentation of an imprinted stimulus. Science, 132, 1395–1396.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rutter, M. (1978). Diagnosis and definition. In M. Rutter & E. Schopler (Eds.), Autism: A reappraisal of concepts and treatment (pp. 1–25). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Spradlin, Joseph E., & Brady, Nancy E. (1999). Early Childhood autism and stimulus control. In P. M. Ghezzi, W. L. Williams, & J. E. Carr (Eds.), Autism: Behavior analytic perspectives (pp. 33–43). Reno: Context.Google Scholar
  16. Skinner, B. F. (1969). The phylogeny and ontogeny of behavior (pp. 172–217). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  17. Skinner, B. F. (1977). Herrnstein and the evolution of behaviorism. American Psychologis, 32, pp. 1006–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Todd, James A., & Morris, Edward K. (1992). Case histories in the great power of steady misrepresentation. American Psychologist, 47, pp. 1441–1453.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Genae A. Hall
    • 1
  1. 1.Behavior Analysis and Intervention ServicesOaklandUSA

Personalised recommendations