Advertisement

The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 31–49 | Cite as

Altering the Function of Commands Presented to Boys with Oppositional and Hyperactive Behavior

  • Jeffrey S. Danforth
Article

Abstract

Mentalistic and behavioral analyses of noncompliance among children with hyperactive behavior are contrasted. Then, a behavioral training program for 3 boys with behavior characteristic of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and oppositional defiant disorder is described. The child-focused training was conducted in conjunction with parent training. In an effort to increase the rate of compliance, the child-training program was designed to alter the function of parent commands by teaching the boys to verbalize rules about parent commands and consequences in the context of observing parent-child role-plays. Training was conducted within a multiple baseline design across children. Direct observation of mother-child interactions, telephone interviews, and standardized rating scales showed that training resulted in clinically significant reductions in noncompliance and improved parenting behavior. A 6-month follow-up revealed stable outcomes.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the child behavior checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, D. S., O’Leary, S. G., Wolff, L. S., & Acker, M. A. (1993). The parenting scale: A measure of dysfunctional parenting in discipline situations. Psychological Assessment, 5, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barkley, R. A. (1988). Attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity. In E. J. Mash & L. G. Terdal (Eds.), Behavioral assessment of childhood disorders: Selected core problems (2nd ed., pp. 69–104). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  5. Barkley, R. A. (1990). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  6. Barkley, R. A. (1997). ADHD and the nature of self-control. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  7. Barkley, R. A. (1998a). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. In E. J. Mash & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Treatment of childhood disorders (2nd ed., pp. 55–110). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  8. Barkley, R. A. (1998b). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  9. Breen, M. J., & Altepeter, T. S. (1991). Factor structures of the home situations questionnaire and the school situations questionnaire. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 16, 59–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chamberlain, P., & Reid, J. B. (1987). Parent observation and report of child symptoms. Behavioral Assessment, 9, 97–109.Google Scholar
  11. Chase, P. N., & Danforth, J. S. (1991). The role of rules in concept learning. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 205–225). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  12. Conners, C. K. (1990). Manual for Conners’ rating scales. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  13. Danforth, J. S. (1998a). The behavior management flow chart: A component analysis of behavior management strategies. Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 229–257.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Danforth, J. S. (1998b). The outcome of parent training using the behavior management flow chart with mothers and their children with oppositional defiant disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behavior Modification, 22, 443–473.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Danforth, J. S. (1999). The outcome of parent training using the behavior management flow chart with a mother and her twin boys with oppositional defiant disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 21, 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Danforth, J. S. (2001, November). Unique characteristics of the behavior management flow chart. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Venice, Italy.Google Scholar
  17. Danforth, J. S., Barkley, R. A., & Stokes, T. F. (1991). Observations of interactions between parents and their hyperactive children: Research and clinical implications. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 703–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Douglas, V. I. (1999). Cognitive control processes in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In H. C. Quay & A. E. Hogan (Eds.), Handbook of disruptive behavior disorders (pp. 105–138). New York: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DuPaul, G. J., & Stoner, G. (1994). ADHD in the schools: Assessment and intervention strategies. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  20. Forehand, R. (1977). Child noncompliance to parent commands: Behavioral analysis and treatment. In M. Hersen, R. M. Eisler, & P. M. Miller (Eds.), Progress in behavior modification (Vol. 5, pp. 111–147). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Forehand, R. L., & McMahon, R. J. (1981). Helping the noncompliant child: A clinician’ s guide to parent training. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  22. Gomez, R., & Sanson, A. V. (1994). Mother-child interactions and noncompliance in hyperactive boys with and without conduct problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 477–490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Graziano, A. M., & Diament, D. M. (1992). Parent behavioral training: An examination of the paradigm. Behavior Modification, 16, 3–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Harvey, E. A., Danforth, J. S., Ulaszek, W. R., & Eberhardt, T. L. (2001). Validity of the parenting scale for parents of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 731–743.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayes, S. C., Zettle, R. D., & Rosenfarb, I. (1989). Rule following. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 191–220). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hineline, P. N. (1983). When we speak of knowing. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 183–186.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Hineline, P. N., & Wanchisen, B. A. (1989). Correlated hypothesizing and the distinction between contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 221–268). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hinshaw, S. P. (1994). Attention deficits and hyperactivity in children. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hupp, S. D. A., & Reitman, D. (1999). The effects of stating contingency-specifying stimuli on compliance in children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 16, 17–27.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuhne, M., Schachar, R., & Tannock, R. (1997). Impact of comorbid oppositional or conduct problems on attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 1715–1725.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Luria, A. R. (1961). The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behavior. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
  32. Martin, G. M., & Pear, J. (1999). Behavior modification: What it is and how to do it. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Mash, E. J., & Barkley, R. A. (1986). Assessment of family interaction with the response-class matrix. In R. J. Prinz (Ed.), Advances in behavioral assessment of children and families (Vol. 2, pp. 29–67). Greenwich, CT: J AI Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mash, E. J., Terdal, L., & Anderson, K. (1973). The response-class matrix: A procedure for recording parent-child interactions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 40, 163–164.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mistr, K. N., & Glenn, S. S. (1992). Evocative and function-altering effects of contingency-specifying stimuli. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 10, 11–21.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Patterson, G. R. (1986). Performance models for antisocial boys. American Psychologist, 8, 432–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pelham, W. E., Wheeler, T, & Chronis, A. (1998). Empirically supported psychosocial treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 190–205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pisterman, S., Firestone, P., McGrath, P, & Goodman, J. T, Webster, I., Mallory, R., & Goffin, B. (1992). The role of parent training in treatment of preschoolers with ADHD. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 62, 397–408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pisterman, S., McGrath, P., Firestone, P., Goodman, J. T, Webster, I., & Mallory, R. (1989). Outcome of parent-mediated treatment of preschoolers with attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 628–635.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Reese, H. W. (1989). Rules and rule-governance: Cognitive and behavioristic views. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 3–84). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reitman, D., & Gross, A. M. (1996). Delayed outcomes and rule-governed behavior among “noncompliant” and “compliant” boys: A replication and extension. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 65–71.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Sajwaj, T, & Dillon, A. (1977). Complexities of an “elementary” behavior modification procedure: Differential adult attention used for children’s behavior disorders. In B. C. Etzel, J. M. LeBlanc, & D. M. Baer (Eds.), New developments in behavioral research: Theory, method, and application (pp. 303–315). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Schlinger, H. D. (1990). A reply to behavior analysts writing about rules and rule-governed behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 77–82.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Schlinger, H. D. (1993). Separating discriminative and function-altering effects of verbal stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 9–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Schlinger, H., & Blakely, E. (1987). Function-altering effects of contingency-specifying stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 10, 41–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Shull, R. L., & Fuqua, R. W. (1993). The collateral effects of behavioral interventions: Applied implications from JEAB, January, 1993. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 409–415.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, I., & O’Reilly, M. F (1997). Toward a functional analysis of private verbal selfregulation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 43–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wahler, R. G. (1975). Some structural aspects of deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 27–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Zettle, R. D., & Hayes, S. C. (1982). Rule-governed behavior: A potential theoretical framework for cognitive-behavioral therapy. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.), Advances in cognitive-behavioral research and therapy (Vol. 1, pp. 73–118). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyEastern Connecticut State UniversityWillimanticUSA

Personalised recommendations