Advertisement

The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 129–141 | Cite as

Verbal Behavior and Initial Exposure to Delayed Reinforcement

  • Tom Byrne
  • Sarah McNulty
  • Quinton Babcock
  • Debra Connors
  • Jennifer MacMillin
  • Felicia Duguay
  • Coarine Maloy
Article

Abstract

Ten subjects responded under a tandem fixed-ratio 1 not-responding-greater-than-t schedule of point delivery during one 75-min session in which the delay was either 10 or 20 s. Subjects were asked to describe the contingencies throughout the session. Although studies with nonhumans have demonstrated response acquisition under similar delayed-consequence procedures, a minority of subjects in the current study demonstrated sensitivity to delayed consequences convincingly. All subjects exhibited inefficient patterns of responding and descriptions of nonexistent contingencies. Subjects who demonstrated learning were more likely to verbalize the actual contingencies, but this was not true in all cases. Furthermore, some subjects who demonstrated learning did not describe the delay contingency. Results suggest that learning may occur in the absence of a person’s ability to describe environment-behavior relations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avila, S. R., & Bruner, C. A. (1995). Response acquisition under long delays of signaled and unsignaled reinforcement. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 59, 117–127.Google Scholar
  2. Catania, A. C, Matthews, B. A., & Shimoff, E. (1982). Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 233–248.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Critchfield, T. S., & Lattai, K. A. 1993). Acquisition of a spatially defined operant with delayed reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 373–387.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Dickinson, A., Watt, A., & Griffiths, W. J. H. (1992). Free-operant response acquisition with delayed reinforcement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45B, 241–258.Google Scholar
  5. Grice, G. R. (1948). The relation of secondary reinforcement to delayed reward in visual discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 1–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Johnsrude, I. S., Owen, A. M., White, N. M., Zhao, W. V., & Bohbot, V. (2000). Impaired preference conditioning after anterior temporal lobe resection in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 2649–2656.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lattai, K. A., & Gleeson, S. (1990). Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 27–39.Google Scholar
  8. Lattai, K. A., & Metzger, B. (1994). Response acquisition by Siamese fighting fish (Beta splendens) with delayed visual reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lattai, K. A., & Williams, A. M. (1997). Body weight and response acquisition with delayed reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Malott, R. W., Whaley, D. L., & Malott, M. E. (1997). Elementary principles of behavior (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Michael, J. L. (1993). Concepts and principles of behavior analysis. Kalamazoo, MI: Society for the Advancement of Behavior Analysis.Google Scholar
  12. Rosenfarb, I. S., Newland, M. C, Brannon, S. E., & Howey, D. S. (1992). Effects of self-generated rules on the development of schedule-controlled behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 107–121.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Rosenfeld, H. M., & Baer, D. M. (1970). Unbiased and unnoticed verbal conditioning: The double agent robot procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 14, 99–105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Schlinger, H. D., & Blakely, E. (1994). The effects of delayed reinforcement and a response-produced auditory stimulus on the acquisition of operant behavior in rats. The Psychological Record, 44, 391–409.Google Scholar
  15. Skinner, B. E (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Engle wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sutphin, G., Byrne, T, & Poling, A. (1998). Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement: A comparison of two-lever procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69, 17–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Svartdal, F. (1989). Shaping of rule-governed behaviour. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 304–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilkenfield, J., Nickel, M., Blakely, E., & Poling, A. (1992). Acquisition of lever-press responding in rats with delayed reinforcement: A comparison of three procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 431–443.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Byrne
    • 1
  • Sarah McNulty
    • 1
  • Quinton Babcock
    • 1
  • Debra Connors
    • 1
  • Jennifer MacMillin
    • 1
  • Felicia Duguay
    • 1
  • Coarine Maloy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMassachusetts College of Liberal ArtsNorth AdamsUSA

Personalised recommendations