The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 89–104 | Cite as

Using Intraverbal Prompts to Establish Tacts for Children with Autism

  • Mark L. Sundberg
  • Katie Endicott
  • Peter Eigenheer


Some children with autism have difficulty acquiring tacts, despite their ability to mand, echo words, and imitate actions. The current study focused on 2 nonvocal children who had acquired a few mands using sign language, but had repeatedly failed to acquire signed tacts. Two procedures were compared to determine the most effective approach for training tacts to these participants. One procedure (the standard condition) used the general verbal prompt “What is that?” The other procedure (the intra verbal condition) used a specific intraverbal prompt “Sign [spoken word].” The results showed that both participants acquired nonimitative verbal responses during the intraverbal condition but not during the standard condition. One participant demonstrated complete transfer to pure tacts, and the other participant showed a partial transfer to pure tacts. These results have implications for the design of language intervention programs for children with autism who have difficulty acquiring tacts.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bijou, S. W., & Ghezzi, P. M. (1999). The behavioral interference theory of autistic behavior in young children. In P. M. Ghezzi, W. L. Williams, & J. E. Carr (Eds.), Autism: Behavior analytic perspectives (pp. 33–43). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  2. Carroll, R. J., & Hesse, B. E. (1987). The effects of alternating mand and tact training on the acquisition of tacts. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 55–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Drash, P. W., High, R. L., & Tutor, R. M. (1999). Using mand training to establish an echoic repertoire in young children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 16, 29–44.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Glat, R., Gould, K., Stoddard, L. T., & Sidman, M. (1994). A note on the transfer of stimulus control in the delayed-cue procedure: Facilitation by an overt differential response. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 699–704.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Guess, D., Sailor, W. S., & Baer, D. (1976). A functional speech and language training program for the severely handicapped. Lawrence, KS: H & H Enterprises.Google Scholar
  6. Kent, L. (1974). The language acquisition program. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lovaas, O. I. (1977). The autistic child: Language development through behavior modification. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  8. Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in children with autism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 6–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Maurice, C., Green, G., & Luce, S. C. (1996). Behavior interventions for young children with autism. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  10. Michael, J. (1993a). Concepts and principles of behavior analysis. Kalamazoo, MI: Society for the Advancement of Behavior Analysis.Google Scholar
  11. Michael, J. (1993b). Establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 191–206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Partington, J. W., Sundberg, M. L., Newhouse, L., & Spengler, S. M. (1994). Overcoming an autistic child’s failure to acquire a tact repertoire. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 733–734.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Singh, N. N., & Solman, R. T. (1990). A stimulus control analysis of the picture-word problem in children who are mentally retarded: The blocking effect. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 525–532.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith, T. (1993). Autism. In T. R. Giles (Ed.), Handbook of effective psychotherapy (pp. 107–133). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Pleasant Hill, CA: Behavior Analysts, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Terrace, H. S. (1963). Discriminative learning with and without errors. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 127.Google Scholar
  18. Touchette, P. E. (1971). Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 347–354.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Ulman, J. D., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1975). Multielement baseline design in educational research. In E. Ramp & G. Semb (Eds.), Behavior analysis: Areas of research and application (pp. 377–391). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Urcuioli, P. J. (1984). Overshadowing in matching-to-sample: Reduction in sample-stimulus control by differential sample behaviors. Animal Learning & Behavior, 12, 256–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark L. Sundberg
    • 1
  • Katie Endicott
    • 1
  • Peter Eigenheer
    • 1
  1. 1.Behavior Analysts, Inc.Pleasant HillUSA

Personalised recommendations