Advertisement

The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 75–88 | Cite as

Effects of a Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing Procedure on Conditioning Vocal Sounds as Reinforcers

Article

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of stimulus-stimulus pairing on conditioning vocal sounds as reinforcers. Four preschoolers with severe language and communication delays participated. In Experiment 1, an attempt was made to condition vocal sounds as a reinforcer by pairing a specific vocal sound with a reinforcing event (e.g., physical interaction). Results indicated that presentation of a stimulus-stimulus pairing was effective in conditioning the target vocal sounds as reinforcers, which increased the occurrence of vocalizations of those sounds by the participants. Experiment 2 compared the effects of the pairing procedure with those of echoic training. The pairing procedure was identical to that in Experiment 1. In the echoic training condition, the experimenter produced the target vocal sound and gave the participant an opportunity to echo. The same reinforcing stimulus (e.g., physical interaction) was provided contingent upon the occurrence of the target vocal sound emitted by the participant. Results showed that the pairing procedure was more effective than the echoic training. Findings from this study suggest that for these participants, who had no vocal imitation skills, the stimulus-stimulus pairing was an effective procedure for conditioning vocal sounds as reinforcers and increased the probability of occurrence of the vocalization without a direct reinforcement contingency.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bijou, S. W., & Baer, D. M. (1965). Child development: Vol. 2. Universal stage of infancy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, R., & Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 11–53). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  5. Holland, J. G. (1992). Language and the continuity of species. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 197–209). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kravitz, H., & Boehm, J. (1971). Rhythmic habit patterns in infancy: Their sequences, age of onset, and frequency. Child Development, 42, 399–413.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lovaas, O. I., Vami, J. W., Koegel, R. L., & Lorsch, N. (1977). Some observations on the nonextinguishability of children’s speech. Child Development, 48, 1121–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Moerk, E. L. (1983). A behavioral analysis of controversial topics in first language acquisition: Reinforcements, corrections, modeling, input frequencies, and the three-term contingency. Journal of Psycholin- guistic Research, 12, 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Moerk, E. L. (1990). Three-term contingency patterns in mother-child verbal interactions during first-language acquisition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 293–305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Mowrer, O. H. (1954). The psychologist looks at language. American Psychology, 9, 660–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nakazima, S. (1962). A comparative study of the speech developments of Japanese and American English in childhood. Study of Phonology, 2, 27–39.Google Scholar
  12. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith, R., Michael, J., & Sundberg, M. L. (1996). Automatic reinforcement and automatic punishment in infant vocal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 39–48.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Sundberg, M. L., Michael, J., Partington, J. W., & Sundberg, C. A. (1996). The role of automatic reinforcement in early language acquisition. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 21–37.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Thelen, E. (1979). Rhythmical stereotypies in normal human infants. Animal Behavior, 27, 699–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thelen, E. (1981). Rhythmical behavior in infancy: An ethological perspective. Developmental Psychology, 17, 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vaughan, M. E., & Michael, J. L. (1982). Automatic reinforcement: An important but ignored concept. Behaviorism, 10, 217–227.Google Scholar
  18. Yoon, S. (1998). Effects of an adult’s vocal sound paired with a reinforcing event on the subsequent acquisition of mand functions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fred S. Keller SchoolYonkersUK

Personalised recommendations