The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 51–56 | Cite as

Chomsky’s Nativism Reconsidered

Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aronoff, M. (1999, December 5). Washington sleeped here: A review of Words and Rules by Steven Pinker. New York Times Book Review, p. 26.Google Scholar
  2. Chase, P. N., & Parrott, L. J. (Eds.). (1986). Psychological aspects of language. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of Verbal Behavior by B. F. Skinner. Language, 35, 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N. (1991). Linguistics and related fields: A personal view. In A. Kasher (Ed.), The Chomskyan turn (pp. 5–23). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Cook, V. J., & Newson, M. (1996). Chomsky’s universal grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Donahoe, J. W., & Palmer, D. C. (1994). Learning and complex behavior. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  7. Gallaway, C., & Richards, B. J. (1994). Input and interaction in language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harris, R. A. (1993). The linguistics wars. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Locke, J. L. (1993). The child’s path to spoken language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Mabry, J. H. (1995). Review of R. A. Harris’ The Linguistics Wars. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 72, 79–86.Google Scholar
  11. Palmer, D. C. (1998). The speaker as listener: The interpretation of structural regularities in verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15, 3–16.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Palmer, D. C., & Donahoe, J. W. (1992). Selectionism and essentialism in cognitive science and behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1344–1358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: William Morrow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Place, U. T. (1992). Behavioral contingency semantics and the correspondence theory of truth. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 135–151). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  16. Rice, M. L. (Ed.). (1996). Toward a genetics of language. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Schoneberger, T. (2000). A departure from cognitivism: Implications of Chomsky’s second revolution in linguistics. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 17, 57–73.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Skinner, B. F. (1935). The generic nature of the concepts of stimulus and response. The Journal of General Psychology, 12, 40–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Snow, C. E. (1996). Toward a rational empiricism: Why interactionism is not behaviorism any more than biology is genetics. In M. L. Rice (Ed.), Toward a genetics of language (pp. 377–396). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Stemmer, N. (1996). Listener behavior and ostensive learning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 247–249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorthamptonUSA

Personalised recommendations