The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 7–38 | Cite as

The Chomsky-Place Correspondence 1993–1994

  • Noam Chomsky
  • Ullin T. Place
  • Ted Schoneberger
Article

Abstract

Edited correspondence between Ullin T Place and Noam Chomsky, which occurred in 1993–1994, is presented. The principal topics are (a) deep versus surface structure; (b) computer modeling of the brain; (c) the evolutionary origins of language; (d) behaviorism; and (e) a dispositional account of language. This correspondence includes Chomsky’s denial that he ever characterized deep structure as innate; Chomsky’s critique of computer modeling (both traditional and connectionist) of the brain; Place’s critique of Chomsky’s alleged failure to provide an adequate account of the evolutionary origins of language, and Chomsky’s response that such accounts are “pop-Darwinian fairy tales”; and Place’s arguments for, and Chomsky’s against, the relevance of behaviorism to linguistic theory, especially the relevance of a behavioral approach to language that is buttressed by a dispositional account of sentence construction.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, D. M., Martin, C. B., Place, U. T, & Crane, T (Eds.). (1996). Dispositions: A debate. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, D. M., & Place, U. T. (1991). A debate on dispositions: Their nature and their role in causation. Conceptus, Band 25, No. 66, 3–44.Google Scholar
  3. Block, N. (1990). The computer model of the mind. In D. N. Osherson & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Thinking: An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 3, pp. 247–289). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Broadbent, D. E. (1991, December). Planning and opportunism. Address to the London Conference of the British Psychological Society, City University, London.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of B. E Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind (enlarged ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. (Original work published 1968)Google Scholar
  8. Chomsky, N. (1973). For reasons of state. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N. (1987). The Chomsky reader. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, N. (1988a). Language and politics. Cheektowaga, NY: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
  13. Chomsky, N. (1988b). Language and problems of knowledge: The Managua lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chomsky, N. (1993). Language and thought. Wakefield, RI: Moyer Bell.Google Scholar
  15. Chomsky, N. (1997). Language and mind: Current thoughts on ancient problems (part 1). Available on line at kcn.ru/tat_en/science/fccl/papers/chomskyl.htm.Google Scholar
  16. Chomsky, N. (2000). New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  18. Churchland, P. M. (1988). Matter and consciousness (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Frege, G. (1956). The thought: A logical enquiry (A. Quinton and M. Quinton, Trans.). Mind, 65, 289–311. (Original work published 1918)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gehrz, R. D., Black, D. C., & Solomon, P. M. (1984). The formation of stellar systems from interstellar molecular clouds. Science, 224, 823–830.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Helm, G. (1993, June). Computers can think! A strange proof and its implications for cognitive science. Paper presented to the Conference on Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind, Bled, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  23. Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H., & Cable, C. (1976). Natural concepts in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behaviour Processes, 2, 285–302.Google Scholar
  24. Humphrey, G. (1951). Thinking: An introduction to its experimental psychology. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  25. Jordan, M. I. (1986). Attractor dynamics and parallelism in a connectionist sequential machine. Proceedings of the eighth annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Lashley, K. S. (1930). Basic neural mechanisms in behavior. Psychological Review, 37, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lashley, K. S. (1938). The mechanism of vision: XV. Preliminary studies of the rat’s capacity for detail vision. Journal of General Psychology, 18, 123–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewontin, R. C. (1990). The evolution of cognition. In D. N. Osherson & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Thinking: An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 3, pp. 229–246). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lycan, W. G. (1990). Mind and cognition: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Matthews, P H. (1993). Grammatical theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moerk, E. L. (1983). The mother of Eve as a first language teacher. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  32. Pearce, J. M. (1988). Stimulus generalization and the acquisition of categories by pigeons. In L. Weiskrantz (Ed.), Thought without language (pp. 132–155). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pearce, J. M. (1989). The acquisition of an artificial category by pigeons. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41B, 381–406.Google Scholar
  34. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: William Morrow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Place, U. T. (1956). Is consciousness a brain process? British Journal of Psychology, 47, 44–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Place, U. T. (1987). Causal laws, dispositional properties and causal explanations. Synthesis Philosophica, 2(3), 149–160.Google Scholar
  38. Place, U. T. (1991). On the social relativity of truth and the analytic/synthetic distinction. Human Studies, 14, 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Place, U. T. (1992). Eliminative connectionism: Its implications for a return to an empiricist/behaviorist linguistics. Behavior and Philosophy, 20, 21–35.Google Scholar
  40. Place, U. T (1996a). Intentionality as the mark of the dispositional. Dialectica, 50, 91–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Place, U. T. (1996b). Linguistic behaviorism as a philosophy of empirical science. In W. O’Donohue & R. F. Kitchener (Eds.), The philosophy of psychology (pp. 126–140). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reeke, G. N., & Edelman, G. M. (1988). Real brains and artificial intelligence. Daedalus, 117, 143–173.Google Scholar
  43. Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  44. Schoneberger, T. (1996, May). Chomsky in retreat. Paper presented at the 22nd annual convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  45. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  47. Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Bantam/Vintage.Google Scholar
  48. Wundt, W. (1907). Uber ausfragexperimente uber dis methoden zur psychologie des denkens. Psychologische, 3, 301–360.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noam Chomsky
    • 1
  • Ullin T. Place
    • 2
  • Ted Schoneberger
    • 3
  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyUSA
  2. 2.University of WalesBangorUK
  3. 3.California State UniversityTurlockUSA

Personalised recommendations