Abstract
In a computer-assisted sentence completion task, the effects of grammar instruction and fluency training on learning the use of the definite and indefinite articles of English were examined. Forty-eight native Japanese-speaking students were assigned to four groups: with grammar/accuracy (G/A), without grammar/accuracy (N/A), with grammar/fluency (G/F), and without grammar/fluency (N/F). In the G/A and N/A groups, training continued until performance reached 100% accuracy (accuracy criterion). In the G/F and N/F groups, training continued until 100% accuracy was reached and the correct responses were made at a high speed (fluency criterion). Grammar instruction was given to participants in the G/A and G/F groups but not to those in the N/A and N/F groups. Generalization to new sentences was tested immediately after reaching the required criterion. High levels of generalization occurred, regardless of the type of mastery criterion and whether the grammar instruction was given. Retention tests were conducted 4, 6, and 8 weeks after training. Fluency training effectively improved retention of the performance attained without the grammar instruction. This effect was diminished when grammar instruction was given during training. Learning grammatical rules was not necessary for the generalized use of appropriate definite and indefinite articles or for the maintenance of the performance attained through fluency training.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alper, T., & White, O. P (1971). Precision teaching: A tool for the school psychologist and teacher. Journal of School Psychology, 9, 445–454.
Ando, J., Fukunaga, N., Kurahachi, J., Suto, T., Nakano, T, & Kage, M. (1992). A comparative study on the two EFL teaching methods: The communicative and the grammatical approach. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, 247–256.
Azuma, M. (1992). Eigo kyouiku no rekishi: Sengohen. In M. Azuma (Ed.), Eigo kyoikuhou handbook (pp. 14–45). [A history of teaching English in Japan: Postwar era. In M. Azuma (Ed.), Handbook of English education.] Tokyo: Taisyukan.
Binder, C. (1988). Behavioral methods improve course performance. Youth Policy, 10(7), 12–16.
Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163–197.
Catania, A. C., Shimoff, E., & Matthews, B. A. (1989). An experimental analysis of rule-governed behavior. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 119–150). New York: Plenum.
Cerutti, D. T. (1989). Discrimination theory of rule-governed behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 259–276.
Dinsmore, D. (1985). Waiting for Godot in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 46, 160–171.
Fotos, S. S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 323–351.
Fotos, S., & Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 605–627.
Helgesen, M. (1991, Autumn). Teaching in Japan. TESOL Journal, 8–9.
Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1992). Breaking the structuralist barrier: Literacy and numeracy with fluency. American Psychologist, 47, 1475–1490.
Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1994). The Morningside model of generative instruction. In R. Gardner III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 173–197). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Johnson, K. R., & Layng,. T. V. J. (1996). On terms and procedures: Fluency. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 281–288.
Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. Cambell & R. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279–296). New York: Appleton–Century–Crofts.
Lane, S. (1981, May). Determining the determiner: Aspects of teaching “the” and “a” in ESL. Paper presented at the National Association of Foreign Student Affairs Conference, Nashville, TN.
Lindsley, O. R. (1992). Precision teaching: Discoveries and effects. Journal ofApplied Behavior Analysis, 25, 51–57.
Master, P (1990). Teaching the English articles as a binary system. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 461–478.
Platinum [computer software]. (1993). Tokyo: Sun System, Inc.
Potts, L., Eshleman, J. W., & Cooper, J. O. (1993). Ogden R. Lindsley and the historical development of precision teaching. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 177–189.
Schlinger, H. D., Jr. (1993). Separating discriminative and function-altering effects of verbal stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 9–23.
Schlinger, H. D., Jr. (1995). A behavior analytic view of child development. New York: Plenum.
Shimamune, S., & Ho, S. C. (1995). The role of grammatical rules when students of English as second language learn definite and indefinite articles. Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis, 8, 128–139.
Shimamune, S., & Malott, R. W. (1994). An analysis of concept learning: Simple conceptual control and definition-based conceptual control. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 12, 67–78.
Singh, N. N., & Solman, R. T (1990). A stimulus control analysis of the pictureword problem in children who are mentally retarded: The blocking effect. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 525–532.
Skinner, B. F (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.
Tomiyama, M. (1980). Grammatical errors communication breakdown. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 71–79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant 05206113 from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture to M. Jitsumori. We are grateful to Ayano Yagasaki and Miho Onaya for their collaborations in some of the phases of this research. We also thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback in revising this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shimamune, S., Jitsumori, M. Effects of Grammar Instruction and Fluency Training on the Learning of the and a by Native Speakers of Japanese. Analysis Verbal Behav 16, 3–16 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392943
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392943