The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 153–155 | Cite as

Contributions of Verbal behavior to Instructional Technology



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Clingan, M. R., & Vargas, E. A. (in press). Non-restricted operant prompting in sequelic instruction. Behaviorology.Google Scholar
  2. Hall, G., & Sundberg, M. L. (1987). Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 41–53.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Kritch, K., & Bostow, D. (in press). Degree of constructed-response interaction in computer-based programmed instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.Google Scholar
  4. Shafer, E. (1994–1995). A review of interventions to teach a mand repertoire. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 12, 53–66.Google Scholar
  5. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York. Appleton-Century-Crofts. Reprinted 1992, B. F. Skinner Foundation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Skinner, B. F. (1986). The evolution of verbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 115–122.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Twyman, J. S. (1996). The functional independence of secondary verbal operants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. UMI Dissertation Services, 9631793.Google Scholar
  9. Vargas, E. A. (1986). Intraverbal behavior. In P. N. Chase & L. J. Parrott (Eds.), Psychological aspects of language (pp. 128–151). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.West Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations