The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 3–16 | Cite as

The Speaker as Listener: The Interpretation of Structural Regularities in Verbal Behavior

  • David C. Palmer


Regularities in word order not specifically addressed by Skinner require behavioral interpretation if our field is to become more influential among students of language. Three such phenomena are briefly described in traditional structural terms and are offered as test cases: subtle differences in dative verbs, transformational traces, and the formation of compound nouns. It is argued that the variables that control such regularities derive from the speaker’s repertoire as listener. Intraverbal frames are established as verbal responses in the listener through reinforcement by parity. Transitions from element to element in such frames are controlled, moment to moment in time, partly by the speaker’s responses as a listener to his or her own verbal behavior. Although this account offers only a tentative interpretation of grammar and syntax in a limited domain, it suggests that the conceptual tools of behavior analysis are adequate to the task of explaining even the most subtle of grammatical rules.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brower, L. (1988). Avian predation on the monarch butterfly and its implication for mimicry theory. The American Naturalist, 131 (Suppl.), S4–S6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, R., & Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 11–53). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Crain, S. (1994). Language acquisition in the absence of experience. In P. Bloom (Ed.), Language acquisition: Core readings (pp. 364–409). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Donahoe, J. W., Burgos, J. E., & Palmer, D. C. (1993). A selectionist approach to reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 17–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Donahoe, J. W., & Palmer, D. C. (1994). Learning and complex behavior. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  7. Elman, J. L. (1995). Language as a dynamical system. In R. Port & R. T. Van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as machine (pp. 195–224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fabbro, F., & Daro, V. (1995). Delayed auditory feedback in polyglot simultaneous interpreters. Brain and Language, 48, 309–319.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gordon, P. (1986). Level-ordering in lexical development. Cognition, 21, 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., Goldberg, R., & Wilson, R. (1989). The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language, 65, 203–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hineline, P. N. (1980). The language of behavior analysis: Its community, its functions, and its limitations. Behaviorism, 8, 67–86.Google Scholar
  12. Hineline, P. N. (1992). A self-interpretive behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1284–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Howell, P., & Powell, D. J. (1987). Delayed auditory feedback with delayed sounds varying in duration. Perception and Psychophysics, 42, 166–172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hutchison, W. R., & Stephens, K. R. (1987). Integration of distributed and symbolic knowledge representations. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Neural Networks, 2, 395–398.Google Scholar
  15. Lowenkron, B. (1991). Joint control and the generalization of selection-based verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9, 121–126.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Moerk, E. L. (1983). A behavioral analysis of controversial topics in first language acquisition: Reinforcements, corrections, modeling, input frequencies, and the three-term contingency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12, 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Palmer, D. C. (1996). Achieving parity: The role of automatic reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 289–290.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Palmer, D. C., & Donahoe, J. W (1992). Essentialism and selectionism in cognitive science and behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1344–1358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: William Morrow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skinner, B. F. (1980). Notebooks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Sundberg, M. L., Michael, J. L., Partington, J. W. & Sundberg, C. A. (1996). The role of automatic reinforcement in early language acquisition. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 21–37.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Thoreau, H. D. (1984). The journal of Henry David Thoreau (Vol. 3: 1851–1852). Salt Lake City: Peregrine Smith Books.Google Scholar
  27. Vaughan, M. E., & Michael, J. L. (1982). Automatic reinforcement: An important but ignored concept. Behaviorism, 10, 217–227.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • David C. Palmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySmith CollegeNorthamptonUSA

Personalised recommendations