Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selecting a response form for nonverbal persons: Facilitated communication, pointing systems, or sign language?

  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The three major types of augmentative communication for nonverbal persons consist of writing (or typing), pointing, and signing. These alternative response forms are examined in terms of their advantages and disadvantages for establishing effective verbal behavior. In addition, these systems are examined using the concepts from Skinner’s (1957) analysis of verbal behavior (i.e., mand, tact, intraverbal, and autoclitic). The results of this analysis show that sign language has the most advantages and the fewest disadvantages, and more closely parallels speech in terms of the verbal operants. Although, the current trend is to favor facilitated communication (typing) and pointing systems, both of these response forms have several disadvantages that impede the development of the verbal operants. It is suggested that for many nonverbal individuals sign language is a better alternative response form, and has a better chance of improving speech.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biklen, D. (1990). Communication unbound: Autism and praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijou, S. W., amp; Baer, D. M. (1965). Child Development II: Universal stage of infancy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondy, A. S., amp; Frost, L. A. (1993). Mands across the water: A report on the application of the picture-exchange communication system in Peru. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 123–128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bonvillian, J. D., amp; Nelson, K. E. (1978). Sign language acquisition in a mute autistic boy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 41, 339–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonvillian, J. D., Nelson, K.E., amp; Rhyne, J. (1981). Sign language and autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1, 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. (1979). Teaching autistic children to use sign language: Some research issues. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9, 345–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S., Remington, B., amp; Light, P. (1988). The role of referential speech in sign language learning by mentally retarded children: A comparison of total communication and sign-alone training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 419–426.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Drash, P. W., amp; Tudor, R. M. (1993). A functional analysis of verbal delay in preschool children: Implications for prevention and total recovery. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 11, 19–29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fristoe, M., amp; Lloyd, L. L. (1977). Manual communication for the retarded and others with severe communication impairments: A resource list. Mental Retardation, 15, 18–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, G., amp; Shane, H. C. (1993). Facilitated Communication: The claims vs. the evidence. Harvard Mental Health Letter, 10, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. A. (1993). Facilitator control as automatic verbal behavior: A verbal behavior analysis. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 11, 89–98.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. A., amp; Chase, P. N. (1991). The relationship between stimulus equivalence and verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9, 107–119.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. A., amp; Sundberg, M. L. (1987). Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 41–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hart B., amp; Risley T. R. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 411–420.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Haskew, P., amp; Donnellan, A. M. (1992). Emotional maturity and well-being: Psychological lessons of facilitated communication. Danbury CT: DRI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, P., amp; Schwethelm, B. (1984). A comparison of the effectiveness of graphic symbol and manual sign training with profoundly retarded children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 223–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbut, B. I., Iwata, B. A., amp; Green, J. D. (1982). Nonvocal language acquisition in adolescents with severe physical disabilities: Blissymbol versus iconic symbol formats. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 241–258.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Keogh, W., amp; Reichle, J. (1985). Communication intervention for the “difficult to teach” severely handicapped. In S. Warren amp; A. Rodgers-Warren (Eds.), Teaching functional language (pp. 157–196). Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaVigna, G. (1977). Communication training in mute, autistic adolescents using the written word. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 7, 135–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I. (1977). The autistic child: Language development through behavior modification, New York: Irvington Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, S. (1976). Bliss symbol - an alternative symbol system for the non-vocal pre-reading child in G. Vanderheiden amp; K. Gillery (Eds.), Non-vocal communication techniques and aids for the severely physically handicapped (pp. 85–104). Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1982). Skinner’s elementary verbal relations: Some new categories. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 1, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1983). Evocative and repertoire-altering effects of an environmental event. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 2, 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1985). Two kinds of verbal behavior plus a possible third. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 3, 1–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1988). The establishing operation and the mand. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 6, 3–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1993). Establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 191–206.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mirenda, P. (1985). Designing pictorial communication systems for physically able-bodied students with severe handicaps. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moores, D. F. (1978) Educating the deaf. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partington, J. W., Sundberg, M. L., Newhouse, L., amp; Spengler, S. M. (in press). Overcoming an autistic child’s failure to acquire a tact repertoire. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.

  • Peterson, N. (1978). An introduction to verbal behavior. Grand Rapids, MI: Behavior Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., Sigafoos, J., amp; Remington. B. (1991). Beginning an augmentative communication system with individuals who have severe disabilities. In B. Remington, (Ed.), The challenge of severe mental handicap (pp. 189–213). Chichester: Wiley amp; Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., York, J., amp; Sigafoos, J. (1991). Communication programming for persons with severe handicaps: Vocal and augmentative strategies. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimland, B. (1964). Infantile Autism. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romski, M. A., amp; Sevcik, R. A. (1988). Augmentative and alternative communication systems: Considerations for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh, D. M. (1977). Language learning by a chimpanzee. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, E. (1993). Teaching topography-based and stimulus selection-based verbal behavior to developmentally disabled individuals: Some considerations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 11, 117–134.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sisson, L. A., amp; Barrett, R. P. (1983). A review of non-speech communication systems with autistic and mentally retarded individuals. In S. E. Breuning, J. L. Matson, amp; R. P. Barrett (Eds.), Advances in mental retardation and developmental disabilities, Vol. 1 (pp. 97–123). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, C. T., amp; Sundberg, M. L. (1990). Comparing topography-based verbal behavior with stimulus selection-based verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 31–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L. (1990). Teaching verbal behavior to the developmentally disabled. Danville, CA: Behavior Analysts, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L., Milani, I., amp; Partington, J. W. (1977, August). The use of sign language with hearing mentally impaired persons. Paper presented at the 85th Annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.

  • Sundberg, M. L., amp; Sundberg, C. A., amp; Partington, J. W. (1993, May). The use of automatic reinforcement procedures to increase the verbal behavior of language delayed children. Paper presented at the 19th Annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago, IL.

  • Van Riper, C. (1978). Speech correction principles and methods (6th ed.). New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderheiden, G. C., amp; Lloyd. L. L. (1986). Communication systems and their components. In S. W. Blackstone (Ed.), Augmentative communication: Introduction (pp. 49–161). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, M. E., amp; Michael, J. (1982). Automatic reinforcement: An important but ignored concept. Behaviorism, 10, 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, M., amp; Koh, S. D. (1970). Early manual communication and deaf children’s achievement. American Annals of the Deaf, 115, 527–536.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D. L., Jacobson, J. W., Paglieri, R. A., amp; Schwartz, A. A. (1993). An experimental assessment of facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 31, 49–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wraikat, R., Sundberg, C. T., amp; Michael, J. (1991). Topography-based and selection-based verbal behavior: A further comparison. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9, 1–17

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zangari, C., Lloyd, L. L., amp; Vicker, B. (in press). Augmentative and alternative communication: An historic perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication.

  • Zwiebel, A. (1987). More on the effects of early manual communication on the cognitive development of deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 132, 16–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Behavior Analysts, Inc., 888 Podva Road, 94526, Danville, CA, USA

    Mark L. Sundberg

Authors
  1. Mark L. Sundberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sundberg, M.L. Selecting a response form for nonverbal persons: Facilitated communication, pointing systems, or sign language?. Analysis Verbal Behav 11, 99–116 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392891

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392891

Search

Navigation