Advertisement

The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 43–54 | Cite as

Behavioral pharmacology and verbal behavior: Diazepam effects on verbal self-reports

  • Thomas S. Critchfield
Article

Abstract

Diazepam (10 mg) was administered to two men performing a delayed matching-to-sample task in which the number of elements in a compound sample stimulus (one of which appeared among 4 comparison stimuli) was manipulated from 1 to 3. After each trial, subjects pressed either a “Yes” or “No” button in response to a computer-presented query about whether the last choice met a point contingency requiring selection of the matching comparison stimulus within a time limit. Diazepam simultaneously produced marginal decreases in matching-to-sample performance and more pronounced decreases in the accuracy of self-reports about the same performance. Diazepam selectively increased false reports of success; false reports of failure were not systematically affected. A signal-detection analysis summarized these patterns as a decrease in self-report discriminability (A′) with no systematic change in bias (B′H). These preliminary results converge with those of clinical lore and the results of studies with other benzodiazepine drugs in suggesting that diazepam can produce an “overconfidence” in performance self-evaluation, the mechanisms and parameters of which remain to be identified. The results were inconsistent with those of one previous study of diazepam’s effects on performance self-evaluation, but given procedural differences between the two studies, the discrepancy may reflect the functional independence of verbal operant classes in Skinner’s (1957) taxonomy.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldessarini, R. J. (1990). Drugs and the treatment of psychiatric disorders. In A. G. Gilman, T. W. Rall, A. S. Nies, & P. Taylor (Eds.), The pharmacological basis of therapeutics (8th ed.) (pp. 383–435). New York: Pergammon.Google Scholar
  2. Branch, M. N. (1984). Rate dependency, behavioral mechanisms, and behavioral pharmacology. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 511–522.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Critchfield, T. S. (1993). Signal detection properties of verbal self-reports. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 495–514.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Critchfield, T. S., & Perone, M. (1990). Verbal self-reports of delayed matching to sample by humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 321–344.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Critchfield, T. S., & Perone, M. (1993). Verbal self-reports about matching-to-sample success: Effects of the number of elements in a compound sample stimulus. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 193–214.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Critchfield, T. S., & Schlund, M. (1992, May). Do drugs really impair judgment? Drug effects on performace self-evaluation. Paper presented at the 18th Association for Behavior Analysis Convention, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Curren, H. V. (1986). Tranquillising memories: A review of the effects of benzodiazepines on human memory. Biopsychology, 23, 179–213.Google Scholar
  9. Dougherty, D. M., Nedelmann, M., & Alfred, M. (1993). An analysis and topical bibliography of the last ten years of human operant behavior: From minority to near majority (1982–1992). Psychological Record, 43, 501–530.Google Scholar
  10. Evans, S. M., Critchfield, T. S., & Griffiths, R. R. (1992). Abuse liability assessment of anxiolytic/hypnotics: Rationale and laboratory lore. British Journal of Addiction, 86, 1625–1632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans, S. M., Funderburke, F. R., & Griffiths, R. R. (1990). Zolpidem and triazolam in humans: Behavioral and subjective effects and abuse liability. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 255, 1246–1255.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Grier, J. B. (1971). Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: Computing formulas. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 424–429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffiths, R. R., Stitzer, M., Corker, K., Bigelow, G., & Liebson, I. (1977). Drug-produced changes in human social behavior: Facilitation by d-amphetamine. Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior, 7, 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Higgins, S. T., Hughes, J. R., & Bickel, W. K. (1989). Effects of d-amphetamine in choice of social versus monetary reinforcement: A discrete-trial test. Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior, 34, 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Higgins, S. T., & Stitzer, M. L. (1988). Time allocation in a concurrent schedule of social interaction and monetary reinforcement: Effects of d-amphetamine. Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior, 31, 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hindmarch, I., & Ott, H. (Eds.) (1988). Benzodiazepine receptor ligands, memory, and information processing. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Lubin, R. A. (1979). Influences on alcohol, interpersonal feedback, and drinking experience upon performance and judgment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 95–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Maylor, E. A., Rabbitt, P. M. A., & Connolly, S. A. V. (1989). Rate of processing and judgment of response speed: Comparing the effects of alcohol and practice. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morrow, D., Leirer, V., Yesavage, J., & Tinklenberg, J. (1991). Alcohol, age, and piloting: Judgment, mood, and actual performance. International Journal of the Addictions, 26, 669–683.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Oah, S., & Dickinson, A. M. (1989). A review of empirical studiesof verbal behavior. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 53–68.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Poling, A., & LaSage, M. (1992). Rule-governed behavior and behavioral pharmacology: A brief comment on an important topic. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 10, 37–44.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1979). Current paradigms and models in human information processing. In V. H. Hamilton, & D. M. Warburton (Eds.), Human stress and cognition: An information processing approach (pp. 115–140). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Roache, J., & Griffiths, R. R. (1985). Comparison of triazolam and pentobarbital: Performance impairment, subjective effects and abuse liability. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 234, 120–133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Roache, J., & Griffiths, R. R. (1987a). Interactions of diazepam and caffeine: Behavioral and subjective dose effects in humans. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, & Behavior, 26, 801–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roache, J., & Griffiths, R. R. (1987b). Lorazepam and meprobamate dose effects in humans: Behavioral effects and abuse liability. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 243, 978–988.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Roy-Byrne, P. P., Uhde, T. W., Holcomb, H., Thompson, K., King, A. K., & Weingartner, H. (1987). Effects of diazepam on cognitive processes in normal subjects. Psychopharmacology, 91, 30–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schutz, H. (1982) Benzodiazepines: A handbook. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Skinner, B. F. (1989). The listener. In B. F. Skinner, Recent issues in the analysis of behavior (pp. 35–47). Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
  31. Stitzer. M. L., Griffiths, R. R., & Liebson, I. (1978). Effects of d-amphetamine on speaking in isolated humans. Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior, 9, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor, J. L., & Tinklenberg, J. R. (1987). Cognitive impairment and benzodiazepines. In H. Y. Meltzer (Ed.), Psychopharmacology: The third generation of progress (pp. 1449–1454). New York: Raven.Google Scholar
  33. Vogel-Sprott, M. (1975). Self-evaluation of performance and the ability to discriminate blood alcohol concentrations. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 36, 1–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Zettle, R. D., & Hayes, S. C. (1982). Rule-governed behavior: A potential theoretical framework for cognitive-behavior therapy. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.), Advances in cognitive-behavioral research and therapy (pp. 73–118). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas S. Critchfield
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations