Advertisement

The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 29–39 | Cite as

A descriptive analysis of family discussions about everyday problems and decisions

  • Dennis Mac Greene
  • Brenna Hafer Bry
Article

Abstract

Skinner’s Verbal Behavior (1957) and “An operant analysis of problem solving” (1966) were used to develop a coding system to analyze the relationships between verbal behaviors in family problem solving discussions. Taking solution statements as a target behavior, sequential relationships were examined with both subsequent and antecedent verbal behaviors, comparing families with higher and lower rates of solution statements. Results indicated that two categories of verbal behavior occurred both subsequent and antecedent to solution statements more frequently in families with higher frequencies of solution statements: Agreements and contingency statements. Results are discussed in terms of an operant theory of problem solving in which agreements may serve as reinforcers for solutions and contingency statements may serve as discriminative stimuli.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atwater, J. B., & Morris, E. K. (1988). Instructions and children’s compliance in preschool classrooms: A descriptive analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 157–167.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bruning, J. L., & Kintz, B. L. (1977). Computational handbook of statistics. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  4. Catania, A. C. (1979). Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Catania, A. C., Matthews, B. A., & Shimoff, E. (1982). Instructional vs. shaped human verbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 233–248.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Cerutti, D. T. (1989). Discrimination theory of rule-governed behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 259–276.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Zurilla, T. J. (1986). Problem solving therapy. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Ericsson, A. K., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Greene, D.M. (1989). Problem solving in families: A descriptive analysis of solution statements in relation to other verbal behaviors. Unpublished master’s thesis, Rutgers — The State University of New Jersey.Google Scholar
  10. Greenspoon, J. (1955). The reinforcing effect of two spoken words on the frequency of two responses. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 409–416.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. House, A. E., House, B. J., & Campbell, M. B. (1981). Measures of interobserver agreement: Calculation formulas and distribution effects. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 3, 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kreckel, M. (1981). Communicative acts and shared knowledge in natural discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lowe, C. F. (1979). Determinants of human operant behavior. In M.D. Zeiler & P. Harzem (Eds.). Reinforcement and the organization of behavior (pp. 159–192). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Lowe, C. F., Beasty, A., & Bentall, R. P. (1983). The role of verbal behavior in human learning: Infant performance on fixed interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 157–164.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Lowe, C. F., Harzem, P., & Hughes, S. (1978). Determinants of operant behavior in humans: Some differences from animals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 373–386.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Luria, A. (1961). The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behaviors. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
  18. Mace, F. C., Lalli, J. S., & Pinter-Lalli, E. (1991). Functional analysis and treatment of aberrant behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 12, 155–180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Matthews, B. A., Catania, A. C., & Shimoff, E. (1985). Effects of uninstructed verbal behavior on nonverbal responding: Contingency descriptions versus performance descriptions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 155–164.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Matthews, B. A., Shimoff, E., & Catania, A. C. (1987). Saying and doing: A contingency space analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 69–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Matthews, B. A., Shimoff, E., Catania, A. C., & Sagvolden, T. (1977). Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 453–468.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive-behavior modification. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meichenbaum, D., & Goodman, J. (1969). The developmental control of operant motor responding by verbal operants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 7, 553–565.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Meichenbaum, D., & Goodman, J. (1971). Training impulsive children to talk to themselves: A means of developing self-control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 115–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Meichenbaum, D., & Goodman, J. (1979). Clinical uses of private speech and central questions about its study in natural settings. In G. Zivin (Ed.). The development of self-regulation through private speech (pp. 325–346). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Patterson, G. R., Ray, R. S., Shaw, D. A., & Cobb, J. A. (1969). Manual for coding family interactions. Microfiche Publications, 440 Park Avenue South, New York, New York, 10016.Google Scholar
  27. Place, U.T. (1988). Contingency analysis of naturally occurring verbal interactions. Unpublished manuscript. University College of North Wales.Google Scholar
  28. Prinz, R. J., Foster, S. L., Kent, R. N., & O’Leary, K. D. (1970). Multi-variate assessment of conflict in distressed and nondistressed mother-adolescent dyads. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 691–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raush, H. L. (1965). Interaction sequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 487–499.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Robin, A. L., & Foster, S. L. (1988). Parent-adolescent problem solving and communication. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  31. Robin, A. L., & Fox, M. (1979). Parent adolescent interaction coding system (PAICS). Unpublished manuscript. University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  32. Rosenfeld, H. M. (1966). Approval-seeking and approval-inducing functions of verbal and nonverbal responses in the dyad. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shimoff, E., Catania, A. C., & Matthews, B. A. (1985). Human operant performance: Sensitivity and pseudo-sensitivity to contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Skinner, B. F. (1957) Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Skinner, B. F. (1966). An operant analysis of problem solving. In B. Kleinmuntz, (Ed.). Problem solving: Research, method, and theory (pp. 225–257. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Spivack, G., Platt, J. R., & Shure, M. B. (1976). The problem-solving approach to adjustment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. Tweney, R. D., Doherty, M. E., & Mynatt, C. R. (Eds.). (1981). On scientific thinking. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Vyse, S., Mulick, J.A., & Thayer, B.M. (1984). An ecobehavioral assessment of a special education classroom. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 5, 395–408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Warren, S. C. (1986). Comparing cohesion and adaptability in clinic and non-clinic families with adolescents using observational and self-report methods. Unpublished master’s thesis, Rutgers — The State University of New Jersey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis Mac Greene
    • 1
  • Brenna Hafer Bry
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WisconsinEau ClaireUSA
  2. 2.Rutgers-The State University of New JerseyUSA

Personalised recommendations