The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 1–17 | Cite as

Topography-based and selection-based verbal behavior: A further comparison

  • Riad Wraikat
  • Carl T. Sundberg
  • Jack Michael
Article

Abstract

Michael (1985) identified two types of verbal behavior, topography-based (e.g., speaking or using sign language) and selection-based (e.g., using a symbol board). Sundberg and Sundberg (1990) and Wraikat (1990) compared these systems in terms of the ease of learning object naming (tact) and giving the correct sign or pointing to the correct symbol on hearing the object name (intraverbal). Sundberg and Sundberg (1990) also compared them for the spontaneous development of a new relation, identifying the object when hearing its name (stimulus class formation or equivalence). The results of both studies favored the topography-based system, but in each case some subjects were not verbally skillful enough to learn either system and some learned both too easily to permit a useful comparison. The current study replicated the two previous ones by teaching the same two verbal relations and testing for the emergence of new relations, but adjusted the task to the subject’s level of functioning during the experiment. This was accomplished by varying the number of object relations being learned, and by interspersing already learned tasks with the training of new tasks. As with the earlier studies, topography-based verbal behavior was easier to learn, and led to more new stimulus-class relations than selection-based verbal behavior. These data confirm the relevant theoretical analysis, and have practical implications for a change in current language training practices.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D’Amato, M. R., Salmon, D. P., Loukas, E., & Tomie, A. (1985). Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys ( Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livia). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 35–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Lazar, R. M., Davis-Lang, D., & Sanchez, L. (1984). The formation of visual stimulus equivalences in children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 251–266.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. McIntire, K. D., Cleary, J. & Thompson, T. C. (1987). Conditional relations by monkeys; reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 279–285.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Michael, J. L. (1985). Two kinds of verbal behavior plus a possible third. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 3, 2–5.Google Scholar
  5. Mirenda, P. (1985). Designing pictorial communication systems for physically able-bodied students with severe handicaps. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1 (2), 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., & Cunningham, S. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discrimination of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  8. Sundberg, C. T., & Sundberg M. L. (1990). Comparing topography-based verbal behavior with stimulus selection-based verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 31–41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Sundberg, M. L. (1987). Teaching language to the developmental disabled: A course manual. Prince George, B. C.: College of New Caledonia Press.Google Scholar
  10. Trefler, E., & Crislip, D. C. (1985). No aid, an Etran, a Minspeak: A comparison of efficiency and effectiveness during structured use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1 (4), 151–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wraikat, R. M. (1990). Teaching tact and intraverbal behavior to developmentally disabled adults: A comparison of topography-based and selection-based paradigms. Unpublished manuscript, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Riad Wraikat
    • 1
  • Carl T. Sundberg
    • 2
  • Jack Michael
    • 2
  1. 1.Mutah UniversityJordan
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyWestern Michigan UniversityKalamaooUSA

Personalised recommendations