The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 77–82 | Cite as

A reply to behavior analysts writing about rules and rule-governed behavior

  • Henry D. SchlingerJr.


Verbal stimuli called “rules” or “instructions” continue to be interpreted as discriminative stimuli despite recent arguments against this practice. Instead, it might more fruitful for behavior analysts to focus on “contingency-specifying stimuli” which are function-altering. Moreover, rather than having a special term, “rule,” for verbal stimuli whose only function is discriminative, perhaps behavior analysts should reserve the term, if at all, only for these function-altering contingency-specifying stimuli.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baldwin, J. D., & Baldwin, J. I. (1981). Behavior principles in everyday life. Englewood Cliffs, N J: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Blakely, E., & Schlinger, H. (1987). Rules: Function-altering contingency specifying stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 10, 183–187.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Catania, A. C. (1989). Rules as classes of verbal behavior: A reply to Glenn. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 49–50.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Catania, A. C. (1984). Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Cerutti, D. T. (1989). Discrimination theory of rule-governed behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 259–276.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Epstein, R. (1982). Introduction. In R. Epstein (Ed.), Skinner for the classroom: Selected papers (pp. 1–7). Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  7. Galizio, M. (1979). Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: Instructional control of human loss avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 53–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Glenn, S. S. (1987). Rules as environmental events. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 29–32.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Glenn, S. S. (1989). On rules and rule-governed behavior: A reply to Catania’s reply. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 51–52.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Hayes, L. J., Thompson, S., & Hayes, S. C. (1989). Stimulus equivalence and rule following. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 275–291.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Malott, R. W. (1988). Rule-governed behavior and behavioral anthropology. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 181–203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Michael, J. (1983). Evocative and repertoire-altering effects of an environmental event. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 2, 19–21.Google Scholar
  14. Palmer, D. C. (1990). A behavioral interpretation of memory. In P. N. Chase and L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 261–279). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  15. Schlinger, H., & Blakely, E. (1987). Function-altering effects of contingency-specifying stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 10, 41–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching-to-sample. An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Skinner, B. F. (1966). An operant analysis of problem solving. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Problem solving: Research, method, and theory (pp. 225–257). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.Google Scholar
  20. Staats, C. K., & Staats, A. W. (1957). Meaning established by classical conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 74–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Vaughan, M. E. (1987). Rule-governed behavior and higher mental processes. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), B. F. Skinner: Consensus and controversy (pp. 257–264). Barcombe, England: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry D. SchlingerJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWestern New England CollegeSpringfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations