Advertisement

The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 83–89 | Cite as

Effects of oral reading rate and inflection on intraverbal responding

  • Henry A. Tenenbaum
  • William D. Wolking
Article

Abstract

Reading comprehension may be defined as a type of intraverbal responding. Only a few studies have reported the effects of the rate and inflection of oral reading performances on this class of intraverbals. In the present study the effects of four conditions; low reading rates (40 to 60 words per minute), with and without inflection, and high reading rates (150 to 200 words per minute), with and without inflection, were studied using six subjects. Two of the subjects were of high school age, reading below grade level, and four were typical third grade students, reading on grade level. The results indicated that the combination of high oral reading rate with inflection, a condition approximating conversational speech, increased both the accuracy and speed of intraverbal responding (comprehension), more than any other combination of variables. A second experiment was conducted which systematically replicated the findings across reading levels, reading passage content, settings, and subjects.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brigance, A.H. (1980). Diagnostic inventory of basic skills. North Bellerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Durrell, D.D. (1949). Development of comprehension and interpretation. Reading in elementary school. Chicago: National Society of the Study of Education.Google Scholar
  3. Ginn reading 720 series. (1976). Lexington, MA: Ginn and Company.Google Scholar
  4. Heilman, A.W. (1967). Principles and practices of teaching reading. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
  5. Johnston, J.M., & Pennypacker, H.S. (1980). Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research. Princeton, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Joyce, J.H. (1988, March). Personal communication. New Medico Rehabilitation Center of Florida, Florida.Google Scholar
  7. Lindsley, O.R. (1983, March). Personal communication. Precision Teaching Conference, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
  8. Lovitt, T.C. (1982, March). Personal communication. Precision Teaching Conference, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
  9. Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith, F. (1971). Understanding reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  11. Spache, G.D., & Spache, E.B. (1977). Reading in the elementary school (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  12. Weaver, W.W., Holmes, C.C., Curtis, J., & Reynolds, R.J. (1970). The effects of reading variation and punctuation condition upon reading comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 2(1), 75–84.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry A. Tenenbaum
    • 1
  • William D. Wolking
    • 1
  1. 1.University of FloridaUSA

Personalised recommendations