Verbally-governed and event-governed behavior
- 4 Downloads
A number of statements prescribe behavior: apothegms, maxims, proverbs, instructions, and so on. These differing guides to conduct present varieties of the dictionary definition of “rules.” The term “rules” thus defines a category of language usage. Such a term, and its derivative, “rule-governed,” does not address a controlling relation in the analysis of verbal behavior. The prevailing confounding of a category of language with a category of verbal behavior appears related to a lack of understanding as to what distinguishes verbal behavior from other behavior. Verbal behavior is a behavior-behavior relation in which events are contacted through the mediation of another organism’s behavior specifically shaped for such mediation by a verbal community. It contrasts with behavior that contacts events directly, and shaped directly by the features of those events. Thus we may distinguish between two large classes of behavior by whether it is behavior controlled by events, or behavior controlled verbally. However, the functional controls operative with both classes of behavior do not differ.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cautela, J. R. & Kearney, A. J. (in press). Overview of behavioral treatment. In M. E. Those, B. A. Edelstein, & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of outpatient treatment of adults. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Goldiamond, I. (1962). Perception. In A. J. Bachrach (Ed.), Experimental foundations of clinical psychology (pp. 280–343). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Grnbaum, A. (1987/1988, Winter). Secular humanism in American political culture. Free Inquiry, 8, 21–25.Google Scholar
- Juliá, P. (1983). Explanatory models in linquistics. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Lee, V.L. (1981). Terminological and conceptual revision in the experimental analysis of language development: Why. Behaviorism 9, 25–54.Google Scholar
- Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (in press). Introductory remarks. In S. Hayes, (Ed.) Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Spradlin, J. E., Cotter, V. W, & Baxley, N. (1973). Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: A study of transfer with retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 5, 556–566.Google Scholar
- Sundberg, M.L. (1987). Teaching language to the developmentally disabled: A course manual. Prince George, B.C.: College of New Caledonia Press.Google Scholar
- Vargas, E. A. (1986). Intraverbal behavior. In L.J. Parrott & P.N. Chase (Eds.), Psychological aspects of language (pp. 128–151). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
- Vargas, E. A. (in press). Verbal behavior and artificial intelligence. In L.J. Parrott, & P.N. Chase, (Eds.), Verbal relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar