Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On diversity in the terminology concerning inhibitory stimulus control: Implications for practitioners of applied behavior analysis

  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The multiplicity of terms employed in the literature of behavior analysis to tact stimuli associated with inhibition effects is considered. It is submitted that whereas there is diversity in the conditioning histories associated with inhibitory stimulus control, there is commonality in the controlling properties invested in contiguous stimuli by those various histories. The author contends that there is heuristic value in organizing the scientific language of behavior analysts on this topic around inhibition as a process. It is further suggested that the many tacts for inhibition-related stimuli, divided as they are along what might be called procedural lines, distract from what is argued here to be the core operation, viz., stimulus mediated inhibition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azrin, N. H. & Holz, W. C. (1966). Punishment. In Honig, W. K. (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 380–447). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M. & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, F. F. & Romer, L. T. (1983). Response prompting and the transfer of stimulus control: Methods, research and a conceptual framework. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 8, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (1979). Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falvey, M., Brown, L., Lyon, S., Baumgart, D. & Schroeder, J. (1980). Strategies for using cues and correction procedures. In W. Sailor, B. Wilcox & L. Brown (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B. & Appel, J. B. (1961). Punishment of S-delta responding in matching to sample by timeout from positive reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 45–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hearst, E. (1969). Excitation, inhibition, and discrimination learning. In N. J. Mackintosh & W. K. Honig (Eds.), Fundamental issues in associative learning. Halifax: Dalhousie University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearst, E., Besley, S. & Farthing, G. W (1970). Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 14, 373–409.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hineline, P. N. (1980). The language of behavior analysis: Its community, its functions and its limitations. Behaviorism, 8, 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig, W. K., Boneau, C. A., Burstein, K. R. & Penny-packer, H. S. (1963). Positive and negative generalization gradients obtained after equivalent training conditions. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56, 111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh, N. J. (1977). Stimulus control: Attentional factors. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.) Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 481–513). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. K. (1980). Principles of everyday behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Monterrey: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rilling, M. (1977). Stimulus control and inhibitory process. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 432–480). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulzer, B. & Mayer, G. (1972). Behavior modification procedures for school personnel. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, T. S. (1980). Bringing autistic self-stimulatory behavior under S-delta stimulus control. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 4, 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, T. S. (1983a). The selective suppression of a stereotypy in an autistic child: A stimulus control approach. Behavioral Psychotherapy, 11, 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, T. S. (1983b). DRO and DRI: A false dichotomy? The Psychological Record, 33, 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, T. S. (1984). Generality in the tacting of autistic children as a function of “naturalness’ in antecedent control. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 15, 27–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, T. S. (1987). The technology of teaching: A behavior analytic approach. In A. Donnellan, D. P. Cohen & R. Paul (Eds.), A handbook of autism and disorders of atypical development. New York; John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

    Thomas S. Woods

Authors
  1. Thomas S. Woods
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woods, T.S. On diversity in the terminology concerning inhibitory stimulus control: Implications for practitioners of applied behavior analysis. Analysis Verbal Behav 5, 77–79 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392822

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392822

Search

Navigation