The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 55–65 | Cite as

The effects of alternating mand and tact training on the acquisition of tacts

  • Robin J. Carroll
  • Bruce E. Hesse
Article

Abstract

Two training procedures were compared with respect to the average number of training trials it took to teach new verbal responses to normal children. Mand contingencies were alternated with tact contingencies in one condition while only tact contingencies were in effect in the other condition. Normal, preschool children served as subjects and toy parts were the objects that were to be named. The results indicated that it took, on the average, fewer trials to teach part names (tacts) in the mand-tact condition than in the tact only condition. Although more research is needed to confirm this, it appears that mand contingencies involve stronger controlling variables and can facilitate the acquisition of a tact repertoire.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hall, G., & Sundberg, M.L. (1987). Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 41–53.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Lamarre, J., & Holland, J. (1985). The functional independence of mands and tacts. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 1, 5–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 1, 149–155.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Peterson, N. (1978). An introduction to verbal behavior. Grand Rapids, MI: Behavior Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Stafford, M., Sundberg, M.L., & Braam, S. (1978, May). An experimental analysis of mands and tacts. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. Sundberg, M.L., Milani, I., & Partington, J. (1977, Aug.). The use of sign language with hearing, non-vocal mentally impaired persons. Paper presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin J. Carroll
    • 1
  • Bruce E. Hesse
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCalifornia State UniversityStanislaus, TurlockUSA

Personalised recommendations