The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Some contingencies of spelling

  • Vicki L. Lee
  • Gwenda M. Sanderson
Article

Abstract

This paper presents some speculation about the contingencies that might select standard spellings. The speculation is based on a new development in the teaching of spelling—the process writing approach, which lets standard spellings emerge collateral to a high frequency of reading and writing. The paper discusses this approach, contrasts it with behavior-analytic research on spelling, and suggests some new directions for this latter research based on a behavioral interpretation of the process writing approach to spelling.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, K. F. (1985). The development of spelling ability and linguistic strategies. The Reading Teacher, 39, 140–147.Google Scholar
  2. Axelrod, S., & Paluska, J. (1975). A component analysis of the effects of a classroom game on spelling performance. In E. Ramp & G. Semb (Eds.), Behavior analysis: Areas of research and application (pp. 277–282). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Axelrod, S., Whitaker, D., & Hall, R. V. (1972). Effects of social and tangible reinforcers on the spelling accuracy of special education students. School Applications of Learning Theory, 4, 4–14.Google Scholar
  4. Beers, C. S., & Beers, J. W. (1981). Three assumptions about learning to spell. Language Arts, 58, 573–580.Google Scholar
  5. Beers, J. W., Beers, C. S., & Grant, K. (1977). The logic behind children’s spelling. Elementary School Journal, 77, 238–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolton, F., & Snowball, D. (1985). Spelling can be taught. Australian Journal of Remedial Education, 17, 39–43.Google Scholar
  7. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1979). Independence of reading and spelling in backward and normal readers. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 18, 674–682.Google Scholar
  8. Broden, M., Beasley, A., & Hall, R. V. (1978). In-class spelling performance: Effects of home tutoring by a parent. Behavior Modification, 2, 511–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, J. (1977). A way of tackling spelling. The Use of English, 28, 21–23.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, C. (1970). Reading, writing and phonology. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chomsky, C. (1971). Write first; read later. Child Education, 47, 296–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cotterell, G. C. (1971). Helping the bad speller. Reading, 5, 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cramer, R. L. (1976). The write way to teach spelling. Elementary School Journal, 76, 464–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cripps, C. (1979). Spelling: A safe account. Remedial Education, 14, 146–148.Google Scholar
  15. Cripps, C. (1983). A report of an experiment to see whether young children can be taught to write from memory. Remedial Education, 18, 19–24.Google Scholar
  16. Cripps, C. (1985). Free to write. Australian Journal of Remedial Education, 17, 29–34.Google Scholar
  17. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., Lowry, L., & Kuehnle, K. (1980). Relationships among simple measures of spelling and performance on standardized achievement tests. Research Report No. 21. University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
  18. DiStefano, P. P., & Hagerty, P. J. (1985). Teaching spelling at the elementary level: A realistic perspective. The Reading Teacher, 39, 373–377.Google Scholar
  19. Dixon, R. (1976). Morphographic spelling. Teacher presentation. Part 1 (Edited by S. Engelmann) Willowdale, Ontario: Science Research Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Epstein, R. (1981). On pigeons and people: A preliminary look at the Columban Simulation Project. The Behavior Analyst, 4, 43–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans, R. I. (1968). B. F. Skinner: The man and his ideas. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  22. Fishman, E. J., Keller, L., & Atkinson, R. C. (1968). Massed versus distributed practice in computerized spelling drills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 290–296.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Foxx, R. M, & Jones, J. R. (1978). A remediation program for increasing the spelling achievement of elementary and junior high school students. Behavior Modification, 2, 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freyberg, P. S. (1964). A comparison of two approaches to the teaching of spelling. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 178–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frisch, S. A., & Schumaker, J. B. (1974). Training generalized receptive prepositions in retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 611–621.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gaskins, I. W. (1982). A writing program for poor readers and writers and the rest of the class, too. Language Arts, 59.Google Scholar
  28. Gentry, J. R. (1982). An analysis of developmental spelling in GNYS AT WRK. The Reading Teacher, 36, 192–200.Google Scholar
  29. Gettinger, M. (1985). Effects of teacher-directed versus student-directed instruction and cues versus no cues for improving spelling performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 167–171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Giacobbe, M. E. (1981). Kids can write the first week of school. Learning, 9, 130–132.Google Scholar
  31. Goetz, E. M., & Baer, D. M. (1973). Social control of form diversity and the emergence of new forms in children’s blockbuilding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 209–217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Goetz, E. M., & Salmonson, M. M. (1972). The effect of general and descriptive reinforcement on “creativity” in easel painting. In G. Semb (Ed.), Behavior analysis and education (pp. 53–61). Kansas: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  33. Goldiamond, I., & Dyrud, J. E. (1966). Reading as operant behavior. In J. Money & G. Schiffman (Eds.), The disabled reader. Baltimore: John Hopkins.Google Scholar
  34. Goldiamond, I., & Dyrud, J. E. (1968). Some applications and implications of behavioral analysis for psychotherapy. In J. M. Shlien, H. F. Hunt, J. D. Matarazzo & C. Savage (Eds.), Research in psychotherapy (vol. 3, pp. 54–89). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  35. Goldiamond, I., Dyrud, J. E., & Miller, M. D. (1965). Practice as research in professional psychology. Canadian Psychologist, 6, 110–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Graves, D. H. (1981). Patterns of child control of the writing process. In R. D. Wahe (Ed.), Donald Graves in Australia —“Children want to write…” (pp. 17–28). Rozelle, N.S.W.: Primary English Teaching Association.Google Scholar
  37. Guess, D. (1969). A functional analysis of receptive language and productive speech: Acquisition of the plural morpheme. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 55–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Guess, D, & Baer, D. M. (1973). An analysis of individual differences in generalization between receptive and productive language in retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 311–329.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Harris, V. W., Sherman, J. A., Henderson, D. G., & Harris, M.S. (1972). Effects of peer tutoring on the spelling performance of elementary classroom students. In G. Semb (Ed.), Behavior analysis and education. Kansas: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  40. Hauser, C. M. (1982). Encouraging beginning writers. Language Arts, 59, 681–686.Google Scholar
  41. Henderson, E. H. (1980). Writing, word knowledge and reading diagnosis. Australian Journal of Reading, 3, 61–66.Google Scholar
  42. Kauffman, J. M., Hallahan, D. P., Hass, K., Brame, T., & Boren, R. (1978). Imitating children’s errors to improve their spelling performance. Journal of learning Disabilities, 11, 33–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kerr, M. M., & Lambert, D. L. (1982). Behavior modification of children’s written language. In M. Hersen, R. M. Eisler & P. M. Miller (Eds.), Progress in behavior modification (vol. 13, pp. 79–108). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kranzberg, M. (1968). The disunity of science-technology. American Scientist, 56, 21–34.Google Scholar
  45. Lee, V. L. (1981a). Prepositional phrases spoken and heard. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 35, 227–242.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Lee, V. L. (1981b). Terminological and conceptual revision in the experimental analysis of language development: Why. Behaviorism, 9, 25–53.Google Scholar
  47. Lee, V. L. (1983). A note on the composition of verbal response forms. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 2, 3–5.Google Scholar
  48. Lee, V. L., & Pegler, A. M. (1982). Effects on spelling of training children to read. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 311–322.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Lovitt, T. C., Guppy, T. E., & Blattner, J. E. (1969). The use of a free-time contingency with fourth graders to increase spelling accuracy. Behavior Research and Therapy, 7, 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. MacKay, H. A., & Sidman, M. (1984). Teaching new behavior via equivalence relations. In P. H. Brooks, R. Sperber, & C. McCauley (Eds.), Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 493–513). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  51. Marsh, G., Friedman, M., Desberg, P., & Welch, V. (1980). The development of strategies in spelling. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in learning to spell (pp. 339–353). London, England: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  52. Moxley, R. A., & Barry, P. A. (1985). Spelling with LEA on the microcomputer. The Reading Teacher, 39, 267–273.Google Scholar
  53. Neef, N. A., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1980). The effects of interspersal training versus high density reinforcement on spelling acquisition and retention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 153–158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Nolan, P., & McCartin, R. (1984). Spelling strategies on the Wide Range Achievement Test. The Reading Teacher, 38, 148–158.Google Scholar
  55. Nulman, J. A. H., & Gerber, M. M. (1984). Improving spelling performance by imitating a child’s errors. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 328–333.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Ollendick, T. H., Matson, J. L., Esveldt-Dawson, K., & Shapiro, E. S. (1980). Increasing spelling achievement: An analysis of treatment procedures utilizing an alternating treatments design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 645–654.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Parsonson, B. S., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Training generalized improvisation of tools by preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 363–380.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Peters, M.L. (1970). Success in spelling. A study of the factors affecting improvement in spelling in the junior school. Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  59. Peters, M. L. (1985). Spelling: Caught or taught? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  60. Peters, M. L., & Cripps, C. (1983). Catchwords: Ideas for teaching spelling (Revised second edition.). Sydney: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  61. Rapport, M. D., & Bostow, D. E. (1976). The effects of access to special activities on the performance in four categories of academic tasks with third-grade students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 372.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Rayek, E., & Nesselroade, E. (1972). Application of behavior principles to the teaching of writing, spelling and composition. In G. Semb (Ed.), Behavior analysis and education (pp. 171–184). Kansas: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  63. Rieth, H. J., Axelrod, S., Anderson, R., Hathaway, F., Wood, K., & Fitzgerald, C. (1974). Influence of distributed practice and daily testing on weekly spelling tests. Journal of Educational Research, 68, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Risley, T. R. (1977). The development and maintenance of language: An operant model. In B. C. Etzel, J. M. LeBlanc & D. M. Baer (Eds.), New developments in behavioral research: Theory, method and application (pp. 81–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  65. Rivalland, J. (1985). Teaching spelling: Helping the developing speller. Australian Journal of Reading, 8, 21–27.Google Scholar
  66. Sidman, M. (1978). Remarks. Behaviorism, 6, 123–126.Google Scholar
  67. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  69. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  70. Snow, C. E. (1983). Literacy and language: Relationships during the preschool years. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tenney, Y. J. (1980). Visual factors in spelling. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  72. Trice, A. D., Parker, F. C., & Furrow, F. (1981). Written conversation with feedback and contingent free time to increase reading and writing in a non-reading adolescent. Education and Treatment of Children, 4, 35–41.Google Scholar
  73. Van Melsen, A. G. (1961). Science and technology (Duquesne Studies. Philosophical Series, 13). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Vaughan, M. E., & Michael, J. L. (1982). Automatic reinforcement: An important but ignored concept. Behaviorism, 10, 217–227.Google Scholar
  75. Venezky, R. L. (1980). From Webster to Rice to Roosevelt. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 9–30). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  76. Walshe, R. D. (1981). Donald Graves in Australia —“Children want to write….” Rozelle, N.S.W.: Primary English Teaching Association.Google Scholar
  77. Walshe, R. D. (1982). Every child can write. Rozelle, N.S.W.: Primary English Teaching Association.Google Scholar
  78. Whitehurst, G. J. (1971). Generalized labelling on the basis of structural response classes by two young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 12, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Whitehurst, G. J. (1972). Production of novel and grammatical utterances by young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13, 502–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ziman, J. (1976). The force of knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vicki L. Lee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gwenda M. Sanderson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of EducationMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
  2. 2.Arrendell Primary Education CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations