Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Some contingencies of spelling

  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents some speculation about the contingencies that might select standard spellings. The speculation is based on a new development in the teaching of spelling—the process writing approach, which lets standard spellings emerge collateral to a high frequency of reading and writing. The paper discusses this approach, contrasts it with behavior-analytic research on spelling, and suggests some new directions for this latter research based on a behavioral interpretation of the process writing approach to spelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, K. F. (1985). The development of spelling ability and linguistic strategies. The Reading Teacher, 39, 140–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, S., & Paluska, J. (1975). A component analysis of the effects of a classroom game on spelling performance. In E. Ramp & G. Semb (Eds.), Behavior analysis: Areas of research and application (pp. 277–282). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, S., Whitaker, D., & Hall, R. V. (1972). Effects of social and tangible reinforcers on the spelling accuracy of special education students. School Applications of Learning Theory, 4, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beers, C. S., & Beers, J. W. (1981). Three assumptions about learning to spell. Language Arts, 58, 573–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beers, J. W., Beers, C. S., & Grant, K. (1977). The logic behind children’s spelling. Elementary School Journal, 77, 238–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, F., & Snowball, D. (1985). Spelling can be taught. Australian Journal of Remedial Education, 17, 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1979). Independence of reading and spelling in backward and normal readers. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 18, 674–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broden, M., Beasley, A., & Hall, R. V. (1978). In-class spelling performance: Effects of home tutoring by a parent. Behavior Modification, 2, 511–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (1977). A way of tackling spelling. The Use of English, 28, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, C. (1970). Reading, writing and phonology. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, C. (1971). Write first; read later. Child Education, 47, 296–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotterell, G. C. (1971). Helping the bad speller. Reading, 5, 2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, R. L. (1976). The write way to teach spelling. Elementary School Journal, 76, 464–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cripps, C. (1979). Spelling: A safe account. Remedial Education, 14, 146–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cripps, C. (1983). A report of an experiment to see whether young children can be taught to write from memory. Remedial Education, 18, 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cripps, C. (1985). Free to write. Australian Journal of Remedial Education, 17, 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., Lowry, L., & Kuehnle, K. (1980). Relationships among simple measures of spelling and performance on standardized achievement tests. Research Report No. 21. University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.

  • DiStefano, P. P., & Hagerty, P. J. (1985). Teaching spelling at the elementary level: A realistic perspective. The Reading Teacher, 39, 373–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. (1976). Morphographic spelling. Teacher presentation. Part 1 (Edited by S. Engelmann) Willowdale, Ontario: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. (1981). On pigeons and people: A preliminary look at the Columban Simulation Project. The Behavior Analyst, 4, 43–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. I. (1968). B. F. Skinner: The man and his ideas. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, E. J., Keller, L., & Atkinson, R. C. (1968). Massed versus distributed practice in computerized spelling drills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 290–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foxx, R. M, & Jones, J. R. (1978). A remediation program for increasing the spelling achievement of elementary and junior high school students. Behavior Modification, 2, 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freyberg, P. S. (1964). A comparison of two approaches to the teaching of spelling. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 178–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, S. A., & Schumaker, J. B. (1974). Training generalized receptive prepositions in retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 611–621.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskins, I. W. (1982). A writing program for poor readers and writers and the rest of the class, too. Language Arts, 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, J. R. (1982). An analysis of developmental spelling in GNYS AT WRK. The Reading Teacher, 36, 192–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettinger, M. (1985). Effects of teacher-directed versus student-directed instruction and cues versus no cues for improving spelling performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 167–171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Giacobbe, M. E. (1981). Kids can write the first week of school. Learning, 9, 130–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, E. M., & Baer, D. M. (1973). Social control of form diversity and the emergence of new forms in children’s blockbuilding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 209–217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, E. M., & Salmonson, M. M. (1972). The effect of general and descriptive reinforcement on “creativity” in easel painting. In G. Semb (Ed.), Behavior analysis and education (pp. 53–61). Kansas: University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldiamond, I., & Dyrud, J. E. (1966). Reading as operant behavior. In J. Money & G. Schiffman (Eds.), The disabled reader. Baltimore: John Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldiamond, I., & Dyrud, J. E. (1968). Some applications and implications of behavioral analysis for psychotherapy. In J. M. Shlien, H. F. Hunt, J. D. Matarazzo & C. Savage (Eds.), Research in psychotherapy (vol. 3, pp. 54–89). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldiamond, I., Dyrud, J. E., & Miller, M. D. (1965). Practice as research in professional psychology. Canadian Psychologist, 6, 110–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, D. H. (1981). Patterns of child control of the writing process. In R. D. Wahe (Ed.), Donald Graves in Australia —“Children want to write…” (pp. 17–28). Rozelle, N.S.W.: Primary English Teaching Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guess, D. (1969). A functional analysis of receptive language and productive speech: Acquisition of the plural morpheme. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 55–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Guess, D, & Baer, D. M. (1973). An analysis of individual differences in generalization between receptive and productive language in retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 311–329.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, V. W., Sherman, J. A., Henderson, D. G., & Harris, M.S. (1972). Effects of peer tutoring on the spelling performance of elementary classroom students. In G. Semb (Ed.), Behavior analysis and education. Kansas: University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, C. M. (1982). Encouraging beginning writers. Language Arts, 59, 681–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, E. H. (1980). Writing, word knowledge and reading diagnosis. Australian Journal of Reading, 3, 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, J. M., Hallahan, D. P., Hass, K., Brame, T., & Boren, R. (1978). Imitating children’s errors to improve their spelling performance. Journal of learning Disabilities, 11, 33–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, M. M., & Lambert, D. L. (1982). Behavior modification of children’s written language. In M. Hersen, R. M. Eisler & P. M. Miller (Eds.), Progress in behavior modification (vol. 13, pp. 79–108). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranzberg, M. (1968). The disunity of science-technology. American Scientist, 56, 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. L. (1981a). Prepositional phrases spoken and heard. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 35, 227–242.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. L. (1981b). Terminological and conceptual revision in the experimental analysis of language development: Why. Behaviorism, 9, 25–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. L. (1983). A note on the composition of verbal response forms. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 2, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. L., & Pegler, A. M. (1982). Effects on spelling of training children to read. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 311–322.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lovitt, T. C., Guppy, T. E., & Blattner, J. E. (1969). The use of a free-time contingency with fourth graders to increase spelling accuracy. Behavior Research and Therapy, 7, 151–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, H. A., & Sidman, M. (1984). Teaching new behavior via equivalence relations. In P. H. Brooks, R. Sperber, & C. McCauley (Eds.), Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 493–513). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, G., Friedman, M., Desberg, P., & Welch, V. (1980). The development of strategies in spelling. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in learning to spell (pp. 339–353). London, England: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moxley, R. A., & Barry, P. A. (1985). Spelling with LEA on the microcomputer. The Reading Teacher, 39, 267–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neef, N. A., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1980). The effects of interspersal training versus high density reinforcement on spelling acquisition and retention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 153–158.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, P., & McCartin, R. (1984). Spelling strategies on the Wide Range Achievement Test. The Reading Teacher, 38, 148–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nulman, J. A. H., & Gerber, M. M. (1984). Improving spelling performance by imitating a child’s errors. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 328–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ollendick, T. H., Matson, J. L., Esveldt-Dawson, K., & Shapiro, E. S. (1980). Increasing spelling achievement: An analysis of treatment procedures utilizing an alternating treatments design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 645–654.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Parsonson, B. S., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Training generalized improvisation of tools by preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 363–380.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M.L. (1970). Success in spelling. A study of the factors affecting improvement in spelling in the junior school. Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. L. (1985). Spelling: Caught or taught? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. L., & Cripps, C. (1983). Catchwords: Ideas for teaching spelling (Revised second edition.). Sydney: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport, M. D., & Bostow, D. E. (1976). The effects of access to special activities on the performance in four categories of academic tasks with third-grade students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 372.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rayek, E., & Nesselroade, E. (1972). Application of behavior principles to the teaching of writing, spelling and composition. In G. Semb (Ed.), Behavior analysis and education (pp. 171–184). Kansas: University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieth, H. J., Axelrod, S., Anderson, R., Hathaway, F., Wood, K., & Fitzgerald, C. (1974). Influence of distributed practice and daily testing on weekly spelling tests. Journal of Educational Research, 68, 73–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risley, T. R. (1977). The development and maintenance of language: An operant model. In B. C. Etzel, J. M. LeBlanc & D. M. Baer (Eds.), New developments in behavioral research: Theory, method and application (pp. 81–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivalland, J. (1985). Teaching spelling: Helping the developing speller. Australian Journal of Reading, 8, 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1978). Remarks. Behaviorism, 6, 123–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E. (1983). Literacy and language: Relationships during the preschool years. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 165–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenney, Y. J. (1980). Visual factors in spelling. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trice, A. D., Parker, F. C., & Furrow, F. (1981). Written conversation with feedback and contingent free time to increase reading and writing in a non-reading adolescent. Education and Treatment of Children, 4, 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Melsen, A. G. (1961). Science and technology (Duquesne Studies. Philosophical Series, 13). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, M. E., & Michael, J. L. (1982). Automatic reinforcement: An important but ignored concept. Behaviorism, 10, 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venezky, R. L. (1980). From Webster to Rice to Roosevelt. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 9–30). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walshe, R. D. (1981). Donald Graves in Australia —“Children want to write….” Rozelle, N.S.W.: Primary English Teaching Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walshe, R. D. (1982). Every child can write. Rozelle, N.S.W.: Primary English Teaching Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. J. (1971). Generalized labelling on the basis of structural response classes by two young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 12, 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. J. (1972). Production of novel and grammatical utterances by young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13, 502–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, J. (1976). The force of knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Education, Monash University, Clayton, 3168, Victoria, Australia

    Vicki L. Lee & Gwenda M. Sanderson

  2. Arrendell Primary Education Center, USA

    Vicki L. Lee & Gwenda M. Sanderson

Authors
  1. Vicki L. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gwenda M. Sanderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, V.L., Sanderson, G.M. Some contingencies of spelling. Analysis Verbal Behav 5, 1–13 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392815

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392815

Search

Navigation