The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 143–157 | Cite as

Punished by Misunderstanding: A Critical Evaluation of Kohn’s Punished by Rewards and Its Implications for Behavioral Interventions with Children

On Books

Abstract

Despite the growth of behavior analysis over the past 30 years, misunderstandings of behavioral theory and practice may threaten its continued growth and application. Alfie Kohn’s Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A’s, Praise, and Other Bribes (1993) offers a view of behaviorism that, if accepted uncritically, could hinder efforts to disseminate behavioral interventions, particularly those involving children. A comprehensive review of Punished by Rewards revealed the following assumptions: (a) Behavior analysis is exclusively derived from animal research; (b) behavior analysts characterize children as passive agents to be manipulated; (c) behavior analysis is a behavior control technology; (d) behavior analysts are uninterested in and ignorant of the causes of behavior; and (e) behavior analysts are unconcerned about the protection and welfare of children. For each class of assumptions, critique and commentary are offered. Empirical and philosophical aspects of Kohn’s arguments are scrutinized, and the implications of continued misunderstandings for the future of behavior analysis and the need for more accurate dissemination of contemporary applied behavioral research are also discussed. Despite Kohn’s apparent biases against behaviorism, it is concluded that a better informed public would find much to like about contemporary behavior analysis.

Key words

behaviorism behavior therapy critical review children intrinsic motivation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelrod, S. (1996). What’s wrong with behavior analysis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azrin, N. H., Stuart, R. B., Risley, T. R., & Stolz, S. B. (1977). Ethical issues for human services. Behavior Therapy, 8, v–vi.Google Scholar
  3. Balsam, P. D., & Bondy, A. S. (1983). The negative side effects of reward. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 283–296.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein, D. J. (1990). Of carrots and sticks: A review of Deci and Ryan’s Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 323–332.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Brigham, T. A. (1989). Managing everyday problems. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  6. Buskist, W., Cush, D., & DeGrandpre, R. J. (1991). The life and times of PSI. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64, 363–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carr, E. G. (1993). Behavior analysis is not ultimately about behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 47–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll-Rowan, L., & Miltenberger, R. G. (1994). A comparison of procedures for teaching abduction prevention to preschoolers. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 335–354.Google Scholar
  10. Carton, J. S. (1996). The differential effects of tangible rewards and praise on intrinsic motivation: A comparison of cognitive evaluation theory and operant theory. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 237–255.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Chance, P. (1991, June). A gross injustice. Phi Delta Kappan, p. 803.Google Scholar
  12. Chance, P. (1992, November). The rewards of learning. Phi Delta Kappan, pp. 200–207.Google Scholar
  13. Clifford, M. M. (1996). Giant problem with a dwarf solution. Review of Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A’s, Praise, and Other Bribes. Contemporary Psychology, 41, 125–126.Google Scholar
  14. Davidson, G. C., & Stuart, R. B. (1975). Behavior therapy and civil liberties. American Psychologist, 30, 755–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dickinson, A. M. (1989). The detrimental effects of extrinsic reinforcement on “intrinsic motivation.” The Behavior Analyst, 12, 1–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth? American Psychologist, 51, 1153–1166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Elliot, S.N. (1988). Acceptability of behavioral treatments: Review of variables that influence treatment selection. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Favell, J. E. (1977). The power of positive reinforcement: A handbook of behavior modification. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
  20. Favell, J. E., & McGimsey, J. F. (1993). Defining an acceptable treatment environment. In R. Van Houten & S. Axelrod (Eds.), Behavior analysis and treatment (pp. 25–45). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferster, C. B. (1965). Classification of behavioral pathology. In L. Krasner & L. P. Ullmann (Eds.), Research in behavior modification: New developments and implications (pp. 6–26). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  22. Ferster, C. B. (1972). An experimental analysis of clinical phenomena. The Psychological Record, 22, 1–16.Google Scholar
  23. Flora, S. R. (1990). Undermining intrinsic interest from the standpoint of a behaviorist. The Psychological Record, 40, 323–346.Google Scholar
  24. Gewirtz, J. L. (1978). Social learning in early human development. In A. C. Catania & T. A. Brigham (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis: Social and instructional processes (pp. 105–141). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  25. Goldfried, M. R. (1995). From cognitive-behavior therapy to psychotherapy integration: An evolving view. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Goldiamond, I. (1984). Training parent trainers and ethicists in non-linear analysis of behavior. In R. F. Dangel & R. A. Polster (Eds.), Parent training: Foundations of research and practice (pp. 504–546). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  27. Goodall, K. (1972, November). Shapers at work. Psychology Today, 53–63, 132–138.Google Scholar
  28. Hayes, S. C., Follette, W. C., & Follette, V. M. (1995). Behavior therapy: A contextual approach. In A. S. Gurman & S. B. Messer (Eds.), Essential psychotherapies: Theory and practice (pp. 128–181). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  29. Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huynen, K. B., Lutzker, J. R., Bigelow, K. M., Touchette, P. E., & Campbell, R. V. (1996). Planned activities training for mothers of children with developmental disabilities: Community generalization and follow-up. Behavior Modification, 20, 406–427.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1992). Breaking the structuralist barrier: Literacy and numeracy with fluency. American Psychologist, 47, 1475–1490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kanfer, F. H., & Busemeyer, J. R. (1982). The use of problem solving and decision-making in behavior therapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 2, 239–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kazdin, A. E. (1989). Behavior modification in applied settings (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  34. Kelley, M. L., & Stokes, T. F. (1982). Contingency contracting with disadvantaged youths: Improving classroom performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 447–454.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Kinder, D., & Carnine, D. (1991). Direct instruction: What it is and what it is becoming. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s. praise, and other bribes. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  37. Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (1975). Turning play into work: Effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children’s intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (Eds.). (1978). The hidden costs of reward. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Mahoney, M. J. (1995). Cognition and causation in human experience. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26, 275–278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Malott, R. W., Whaley, D. L., & Malott, M. E. (1997). Elementary principles of behavior (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  41. Martin, G. L., & Hrycaiko, D. (1983). Behavior modification and coaching: Principles, procedures, and research. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
  42. Masters, J. C., Burish, T. G., Hollon, S. D., & Rimm, D. C. (1987). Behavior therapy: Techniques and empirical findings (3rd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  43. Maurice, C. (1996, May). One parent’s reflections on persuasion and partnership. Opening address, annual meeting of the Association of Behavior Analysis, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  44. Michael, J. (1991). A behavioral perspective on college teaching. The Behavior Analyst, 14, 229–240.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Miltenberger, R. G. (1997). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  46. Montemayor, E. F. (1995). Review of Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A’s, Praise, and Other Bribes. Personnel Psychology, 48, 941–945.Google Scholar
  47. Nevin, A. (1982). Editorial. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 1–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Nezu, A. M., & Nezu, C. M. (Eds.). (1989). Clinical decision making in behavior therapy: A problem solving perspective. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  49. O’Leary, K. D. (1972). Behavior modification in the classroom: A rejoinder to Winett and Winkler. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 505–515.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Patterson, C. H. (1986). Theories of counseling and psychotherapy (4th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  51. Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
  52. Paul, G. L., & Lentz, R. J. (1977). Psychosocial treatment of chronic mental patients: Milieu versus social learning programs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Repp, A. C., & Singh, N. N. (1990). The use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.Google Scholar
  54. Schlinger, H. D. (1995, May). Genetic theories of human behavior in the popular press: Should behavior analysts be concerned? In J. Goldschmidt (Chair), Behavior and biology. A symposium presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  55. Schwartz, A., & Goldiamond, I. (1975). Social casework: A behavioral approach. London: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Schwartz, B., & Lacey, H. (1982). Behaviorism, science, & human nature. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  57. Scotti, J. R., McMorrow, M. J., & Trawitzski, A. L. (1993). Behavioral treatment of chronic psychiatric disorders: Publication trends and future directions. Behavior Therapy, 24, 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  59. Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.Google Scholar
  60. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  61. Skinner, B. F. (1966). An operant analysis of problem solving. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Problem solving: Research, method, and theory (pp. 225–257). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  62. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  63. Skinner, B. F. (1984). The shame of American education. American Psychologist, 39, 947–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Cooperative learning and group contingencies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stuart, R. B. (1971). A three-dimensional program for the treatment of obesity. Behavior Research and Therapy, 9, 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Todd, J. T., & Morris, E. K. (1983). Misconception and miseducation: Presentations of radical behaviorism in psychology textbooks. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 153–160.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Todd, J. T., & Morris, E. K. (1992). Case histories in the great power of steady misrepresentation. American Psychologist, 47, 1441–1453.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Travers, J. F., Elliot, S. N., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1993). Educational psychology: Effective teaching, effective learning. New York: Brown & Benchmark.Google Scholar
  69. Turkat, I. D., Harris, F. C., & Forehand, R. (1979). An assessment of the public reaction to behavior modification. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 10, 101–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Van Houten, R., Axelrod, S., Bailey, J. S., Favell, J. E., Foxx, R. M., Iwata, B. A., & Lovaas, O. I. (1988). The right to effective behavioral treatment. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 111–114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Vargas, E. A., & Vargas, J. S. (1991). Programmed instruction: What it is and how to do it. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vasta, R. (1981). On the rewards and real dangers: A look at the data. Behavior Modification, 5, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vasta, R., & Stirpe, L. A. (1979). Reinforcement’s effects on three measures of children’s interest in math. Behavior Modification, 3, 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vaughan, M. E., & Michael, J. L. (1982). Automatic reinforcement: An important but ignored concept. Behaviorism, 10, 217–228.Google Scholar
  75. Vollmer, T. R., & Northup, J. (1996). Some implications of functional analysis for school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. West, R. P., & Young, K. R. (1992). Precision teaching. In R. P. West & L. A. Hamerlynck (Eds.), Designs for excellence in education: The legacy of B. F. Skinner (pp. 113–146). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.Google Scholar
  77. Winett, R. A., & Winkler, R. C. (1972). Current behavior modification in the classroom: Be still, be quiet, be docile. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 499–504.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Wolpe, J. (1978). The humanity of behavior therapy. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychology, 9, 205–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Woolfolk, A. E., Woolfolk, R. L., & Wilson, G. T. (1977). A rose by any other name …: Labeling bias and attitudes toward behavior modification. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 184–191.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations