Advertisement

The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 37–52 | Cite as

The Experimental Analysis of Human Sexual Arousal: Some Recent Developments

  • Bryan Roche
  • Dermot Barnes
Article

Abstract

Experimental analyses of human sexual arousal have been decidedly sparse. Recent developments in the analysis of derived relational responding, however, have opened the way for a modern behavior-analytic treatment of complex or “novel” human behavior, including specific instances of human sexual arousal. The current article examines some of these developments and their relevance to the analysis of emotional behavior, with a focus on sexual arousal. Recent research that has examined the acquisition of sexual stimulus functions within a relational frame paradigm is then outlined. Finally, a series of relational frame interpretations of a variety of human sexual arousal phenomena is offered.

Key words

human sexuality sexual arousal relational frame theory stimulus equivalence derived transfer respondent operant 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bancroft, J. (1970). A comparative study of aversion and desensitization in the treatment of homosexuality. In L. E. Burns & J. L. Worsley (Eds.), Behaviour therapy in the 1970s (pp. 1–22). Bristol, England: John Wright and Sons.Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, D. H., Agras, W. S., Leitenberg, H., & Callahan, E. F. (1972). The contribution of therapeutic instructions to covert sensitization. Behavior Research and Therapy, 10, 411–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91–124.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, D. (1996). Naming as a technical term: Sacrificing behavior analysis at the altar of popularity? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 264–267.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes, D., Browne, M., Smeets, P., & Roche, B. (1995). A transfer of functions and a conditional transfer of functions through equivalence relations in three- to six-year-old children. The Psychological Record, 45, 405–430.Google Scholar
  6. Barnes, D., & Holmes, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19–31.Google Scholar
  7. Barnes, D., & Keenan, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and non-arbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 61–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1996). Relational frame theory and stimulus equivalence are fundamentally different: A reply to Saunders’ commentary. The Psychological Record, 46, 489–507.Google Scholar
  9. Beloff, H. (1992). Mother, father and me: Our IQ. The Psychologist, 5, 309–311.Google Scholar
  10. Biglan, A. (1995). Changing cultural practices: A contextualistic framework for intervention research. Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bourget, D., & Bradford, J. M. (1987). Fire fetishism, diagnostic and clinical implications: A review of two cases. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 32, 459–462.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, R. (1986). Social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brownmiller, S. (1985). Against our will: Men, women and rape. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  14. Cox, M. (1979). Dynamic psychotherapy with sex-offenders. In I. Rosen (Ed.), Sexual deviation (pp. 306–350). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Filion, D. L. (1990). The electrodermal system. In J. Cacioppo & L. G. Tassinory (Eds.), Principles of physiology: Physical, social, and inferential elements (pp. 295–324). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Donahoe, J. W., & Palmer, D. C. (1994). Learning and complex behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  17. Dougher, M. J., Augustson, E., Markham, M. R., Greenway, D. E., & Wulfert, E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 331–352.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1994). A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 251–267.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163–184.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1996). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness and opposition. The Psychological Record, 46, 271–300.Google Scholar
  21. Earls, C. M., & Castonguay, L. G. (1989). The evaluation of olfactory aversion for a bisexual paedophile with a single-case multiple baseline design. Behavior Therapy, 20, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gelder, M. (1979). Behaviour therapy for sexual deviations. In I. Rosen (Ed.), Sexual deviation (pp. 351–375). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gosselin, C., & Wilson, G. (1984). Fetishism, sadomasochism and related behaviours. In K. Howells (Ed.), The psychology of sexual diversity (pp. 89–110). New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Green, G., Stromer, R., & Mackay, H. A. (1993). Relational learning in stimulus sequences. The Psychological Record, 43, 599–616.Google Scholar
  25. Guerin, B. (1994). Analyzing social behavior: Behavior analysis and the social sciences. Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hayes, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19–41). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hayes, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9–30). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hayes, S. C., & Barnes, D. (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 235–244.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Hayes, S. C., & Barnes, D. (in press). Relational frame theory: Creating an alternative behavioral agenda in language and cognition. Reno, NV. Context Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 153–190). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Langevin, R., & Martin, M. (1975). Can erotic responses be classically conditioned? Behavior Therapy, 6, 350–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laws, D. R., & Marshall, W. L. (1990). A conditioning theory of the etiology and maintenance of deviant sexual preference and behavior. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault (pp. 209–229). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lipkens, R. (1992). A behavior analysis of complex human functioning: Analogical reasoning. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
  34. LoPiccolo, J. (1994). Acceptance and broad spectrum treatment of paraphilias. In S. C. Hayes, N. S. Jacobson, V. M. Follette, & M. J. Dougher (Eds.), Acceptance and change: Content and context in psychotherapy (pp. 149–170). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lovibond, S. H. (1963). Conceptual thinking, personality and conditioning. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2, 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maletzky, B. M. (1991). Treating the sexual offender. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Marks, I. M. (1987). Fears, phobias and rituals: Panic, anxiety and their disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Marshall, W. L., & Barbaree, H. E. (1988). An outpatient treatment programme for child molesters. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 528, 205–214.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Marshall, W. L., Laws, D. R., & Barbaree, H. E. (1990). Handbook of sexual assault. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1979). Homosexuality in perspective. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  41. McConaghy, N. (1969). Subjective and penile Plethysmograph responses following aversion-relief and apomorphine aversion therapy for homosexual impulses. British Journal of Psychiatry, 115, 723–730.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. McConaghy, N. (1987). A learning approach. In J. H. Geer & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality (pp. 282–333). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  43. McGuire, R. J., Carlisle, J. M., & Young, B. G. (1965). Sexual deviations as conditioned behavior: A hypothesis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2, 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Murphy, W. D. (1990). Assessment and modification of cognitive distortions in sex. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault (pp. 331–361). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Donohue, W., & Plaud, J. (1994). The conditioning of human sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 321–344.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Oxford English dictionary and thesaurus (2nd ed.). (1996). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Quinsey, V. L., & Marshall, W. L. (1983). Procedures for reducing inappropriate sexual arousal: An evaluation review. In J. G. Geer & I. R. Stuart (Eds.), The sexual aggressor: Current perspectives on treatment (pp. 267–289). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  48. Rachman, S. (1966). Sexual fetishism: An experimental analogue. The Psychological Record, 16, 293–296.Google Scholar
  49. Rachman, S. J. (1977). The conditioning theory of fear-acquisition: A critical examination. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 15, 375–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Rachman, S., & Hodgson, R. J. (1968). Experimentally-induced “sexual fetishism”: Repliacation and development. The Psychological Record, 18, 25–27.Google Scholar
  51. Rimm, D. C., & Masters, J. C. (1979). Behavior therapy: Techniques and empirical findings (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  52. Roche, B., & Barnes, D. (1996). Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and sexual categorization: A critical test of the derived difference relation. The Psychological Record, 46, 477–487.Google Scholar
  53. Roche, B., & Barnes, D. (1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus function in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275–301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Rosengrant, J. (1986). Contributions to psychohistory: Fetish symbols in Playboy centerfolds. Psychological Reports, 59, 623–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Segal, L. (1990). Changing masculinities: Changing men. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
  56. Steele, D., & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Wulfert, E., & Hayes, S. C. (1988). Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125–144.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Wysocki, D. K. (1993). Construction of masculinity: A look into the lives of heterosexual male transvestites. Feminism and Psychology, 3, 374–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zilbergeld, B. (1979). Men and sex. London: Souvenir Press.Google Scholar
  60. Zuckerman, M. (1983). Sexual arousal in the human: Love chemistry, or conditioning. In A. Gale & J. A. Edwards (Eds.), Physiological correlates of human behavior (pp. 299–326). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bryan Roche
    • 1
  • Dermot Barnes
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University CollegeCorkIreland
  2. 2.Behavior Analysis and Cognitive Science Unit, Department of Applied PsychologyNational University of IrelandCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations