Dying Slowly with Compassion and Dignity: A Commentary
- 5 Downloads
Fraley offers a provocative behavior-analytic perspective on the process of slow death. I argue that the value of his insightful analysis is severely compromised by his insistence on equating behavioral competence with personal worth. Fraley errs by proclaiming that his philosophy is science, that existing social practices are essential human attributes, and that idiosyncratic reinforcing stimuli are universally functional. Further, his philosophical tenet is fundamentally inconsistent with his genuinely humane goal of understanding and promoting protracted dying as a behavioral rather than metaphysical phenomenon.
Key wordsthanatology social issues terminal illness behavior therapy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Fraley, L. E. (1994a). Author comments on the reviews by Cloward and Rakos. Behavior and Social Issues, 4, 43–49.Google Scholar
- Fraley, L. E. (1994b). Behaviorological corrections: A new concept of prison from a natural science discipline. Behavior and Social Issues, 4, 3–33.Google Scholar
- Leary, M. R. (1995). Introduction to behavioral research methods (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar